You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 8137292 (Thread)

# seeing as we see to be doing photoshop effects day today
heres my first HDRI attempt:

Click 4 Biggy

Click for original
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 18:13, archived)
# Constructive feedback:
This is a particularly poor subject for HDRI since there's such a low dynamic range in this environment to begin with.
HDRI is most effective (and was developed for) environments where there's a particularly wide dynamic range which is impossible to capture in a single shot.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Trencin_hdr_001.jpg
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 18:17, archived)
# HDRIS
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 18:18, archived)
# Hahahaha
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 18:20, archived)
#
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 18:20, archived)
# bully
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 18:19, archived)
# NO U
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 18:23, archived)
# Quite the contrast !
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 18:19, archived)
# thanks i'll try it again on a different piccy
i think thats the first time i've ever got constructive feedback on here, mostly its abuse, surrealness and CDCs
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 18:22, archived)
# No problem
but reading your comment here I don't think I've understood what it is you're doing.
My understanding of HDRI is that it's constructed of multiple shots of the same scene taken with different exposures and then combined. From your comment above, I don't think that's what you're doing here?
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 18:25, archived)
# 100% Correctedness
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 18:29, archived)
# no i'm just playing
i figured i could get the same effect by using one pic then altering the exposure in the raw file processor to get three separate images with different exposures, then combining the images. will this not have the same effect as three separate images taken in camera?
i was being lazy, that might be the problem.
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 19:02, archived)
# That's perfectly okay for HDR
It's just not as good as several images. Especially if your camera doesn't have a particularly broad sensitivity.

The purists go for several images over quite a wide range of exposures.

(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 19:11, archived)
# okay
i'll do it properly next time and post results here for all to see
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 19:18, archived)
# It seems like that should work
but it won't produce the same results, because whatever exposure you choose in the raw settings for a single shot cannot reveal details which were not within the exposure range of that shot. The idea of multiple-exposure shots is that you can comfortably extend the range beyond the exposure capabilities of a single shot. It really does work and is well worth the trouble. Choice of subject is really important though. Choose something with a very wide dynamic range to begin with.
There are lots of tutorials online, some of which are excellent.
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 19:28, archived)
# thanks
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 19:41, archived)
# ur doin it wrong etc.
You need to take multiple shots with different exposures - you have a D70 so you can do that fine. You'd want a picture with a high enough exposure to get the details on the buildings for it to be a good looking photo though.
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 18:36, archived)
# Ooo that's lovely ...
I love cityscapes at the mo. This is in Illustrator, though:



CFB
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 18:18, archived)
# Everything about this is wonderful . . .
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 18:27, archived)
# Why thank you ... !
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 18:29, archived)
# I dig the concept . . .
(, Wed 5 Mar 2008, 18:23, archived)