
wildly inefficent with overblown claims on the power they produce.
not to mention the tonnes and tonnes of concrete that it takes to anchor one into the ground.
( ,
Mon 10 Mar 2008, 22:58,
archived)
not to mention the tonnes and tonnes of concrete that it takes to anchor one into the ground.

I'm a bit fucked off with them too, especially after reading up on just how much the push to install them is based on the money that the powerplant owners make from governmental cash flow. Don't get me wrong, I do think they can work, but the margin to do so is so narrow at the moment that this massive push is only going to end in tears.
( ,
Mon 10 Mar 2008, 23:03,
archived)

we can only be a decade or two away from Fusion after all
( ,
Mon 10 Mar 2008, 23:12,
archived)

and power cuts.
Now I hear the French are here to possibly create a wind farm up the coast where the wind howls almost constantly.
I cannot see how windfarms will solve this massive problem.
See Thor's reply for the reason.
They are tree-huggers' solutions that in reality are relatively inefficient.

( ,
Mon 10 Mar 2008, 23:34,
archived)
Now I hear the French are here to possibly create a wind farm up the coast where the wind howls almost constantly.
I cannot see how windfarms will solve this massive problem.
See Thor's reply for the reason.
They are tree-huggers' solutions that in reality are relatively inefficient.
