b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 8194510 (Thread)

# an impedance of pedants?
(, Tue 18 Mar 2008, 22:59, archived)
# apparently, the Collins edition has it as
a "mnng" or a "durr" of pedi.
(, Tue 18 Mar 2008, 23:02, archived)
# and not as a mmmllngngnglngllmglng*dribble*mlgnlgnlg of pedants?
(, Tue 18 Mar 2008, 23:03, archived)
# don't make me laugh you cunt, i've got a nasty enough cough as it is
(, Tue 18 Mar 2008, 23:04, archived)
# haha
*unzips*

I've got plenty of cough syrup!
(, Tue 18 Mar 2008, 23:07, archived)
# nah, that'll only make me choke
(, Tue 18 Mar 2008, 23:10, archived)
# ah well
more for me

*glugglugglug*
(, Tue 18 Mar 2008, 23:21, archived)
# which definition of pedant are we using here?
(, Tue 18 Mar 2008, 23:03, archived)
# "Which definition of the word "pedant" are we utilising in this instance, please?"
(, Tue 18 Mar 2008, 23:05, archived)
# I don't know if it's the metric or the imperial one
but as the imperial system of measurement is a metric system that'll just add to the pendantry
(, Tue 18 Mar 2008, 23:06, archived)
#
(, Tue 18 Mar 2008, 23:07, archived)
# :D
(, Tue 18 Mar 2008, 23:08, archived)
# No, no. That's how you rate pedants.
Level of impedance = how many faults they find.
(, Tue 18 Mar 2008, 23:03, archived)
# surely the level of impedance is the amount of faults there are.
and not how many are found?

:)
(, Tue 18 Mar 2008, 23:05, archived)
# No.
I made it up, I set the rules.

Ner-nikky-ner-ner.
(, Tue 18 Mar 2008, 23:05, archived)
# aha! but!
*undresses*
(, Tue 18 Mar 2008, 23:07, archived)
# I see.
Well then; I shall have to reply with a:

*fondle*
(, Tue 18 Mar 2008, 23:08, archived)