
her financial demands are just mind boggling.
£40k a year for wine for example. She doesn't drink.
And £600k a year for her 'charity work'. How does that make any sense?
( ,
Wed 19 Mar 2008, 9:24,
archived)
£40k a year for wine for example. She doesn't drink.
And £600k a year for her 'charity work'. How does that make any sense?

wine isn't for drinking, it's for storing in your wine cellar so it goes dusty
( ,
Wed 19 Mar 2008, 9:27,
archived)

no wonder I keep waking up with a headache
( ,
Wed 19 Mar 2008, 9:30,
archived)

It requires that children should be unable to differentiate between the lifestyles of their parents as a result of financial impediment.
So if Paul spends that much on wine, she should be able to.
(I'm not defending her, I think she needs a good long spell in an institution)
( ,
Wed 19 Mar 2008, 9:39,
archived)
So if Paul spends that much on wine, she should be able to.
(I'm not defending her, I think she needs a good long spell in an institution)