Thing ishow can they prove that the daily Express libelled them, when it's not yet been proven that they were/were not involved...
Its very odd.
(Its very odd.
Joe Scaramanga with a G-double-O-D vibration,
Wed 19 Mar 2008, 16:26,
archived)
they havemoneyand are therefore, right :)
(
discomeats This canoe,
Wed 19 Mar 2008, 16:30,
archived)
yeh, this is my problemwhich is why it's such a shitty sum for such a big case.
(
drbroon abloooobloobloo,
Wed 19 Mar 2008, 16:36,
archived)
Who has to provide the proof? If someone libels you, do you have to prove they're wrong, or do they have to prove they're right? I suspect the latter, hence the verdict.
(
shrinking man Been away a while, time I ventured back,
Wed 19 Mar 2008, 17:01,
archived)