
He had all the time to sort it out. I don't recall them removing the bit saying but you will rarely need to make your image larger than 400 pixels wide.
It's hardly difficult and highly courteous to link to a bigger image.
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:43,
archived)
It's hardly difficult and highly courteous to link to a bigger image.

Nowhere.
Leave the poor noob alone, I'm having flashbacks.
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:46,
archived)
Leave the poor noob alone, I'm having flashbacks.

I can understand the bandwidth thing, but dimensions?
Unless you're on capped scrolling.
Ultimately the post is funny, ergo it's justified.
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:50,
archived)
Unless you're on capped scrolling.
Ultimately the post is funny, ergo it's justified.

Odd, I'll accept. Maybe it's just me but I can remember everything getting shouted at when I started if it was over 400px wide. Mind you those same paupers had shitty little monitors on 800x600 at best.
Perhaps its just me but they provided us with hosting and auto thumbnailing I think it is polite to use it.
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 1:55,
archived)
Perhaps its just me but they provided us with hosting and auto thumbnailing I think it is polite to use it.


I only really get fucked of with people flaunting 'the rules' if the idea is shit and / or it's not funny / well executed. I found this funny so don't really see the problem.
'Politeness' and 'neatness' seem a little bit bureaucratic for a place that's supposedly meant to be about having a laugh.
( ,
Thu 17 Apr 2008, 2:04,
archived)
'Politeness' and 'neatness' seem a little bit bureaucratic for a place that's supposedly meant to be about having a laugh.