Surely that would only allow you to see radiation which strikes the glasses though.Which to be honest would be rubbish and about the same as a Geiger counter.
(,
Mon 19 May 2008, 20:24,
archived)
In the same way as your eyes only see light which strikes them.It might be pretty.
(
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Mon 19 May 2008, 20:25,
archived)
It wouldn't be the sameunless the crystals release a photon in the same direction the original radiation was traveling in. If not, they'd just be opaque glasses that light up.
If you could put a layer of these crystals over the retina, that might work.
(,
Mon 19 May 2008, 20:29,
archived)
If you could put a layer of these crystals over the retina, that might work.
That is true.If the crystal were thin enough, it should give you a little blob of light around the interaction, if there's not too much reflection.
But if they were that thin, the amount of radiation you'd see would be a fraction of the amount destroying your eyes.
(But if they were that thin, the amount of radiation you'd see would be a fraction of the amount destroying your eyes.
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Mon 19 May 2008, 20:31,
archived)
You could build a pair of complete artificial eyes to wear in front of your real eyesconnected to some kind of screen on the back of the glasses.
(,
Mon 19 May 2008, 20:44,
archived)
In this case, you may as well strap it to a little remote controlled thingumy,so you don't have to go near the radioactivity.
( my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Mon 19 May 2008, 20:51,
archived)
Ok, ok, you can go in.And you'll have a handy device showing you how badly you're being irradiated.
( my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Mon 19 May 2008, 20:57,
archived)
Not only that, I could see exactly what was most radioactiveand run away from it or cosy up to it, according to taste. Might be handy in some kind of post-apocalyptic nightmare world.
(,
Mon 19 May 2008, 21:01,
archived)
Not only that,but I predict they'll make quite an impressive fashion statement.
( my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Mon 19 May 2008, 21:02,
archived)
Another idea is to put a collimator behind the crystal,to absorb the photons which don't head straight to the eye after being produced in the crystal.
This kind of thing en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Collimator.jpg
(This kind of thing en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Collimator.jpg
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Mon 19 May 2008, 20:36,
archived)
needs more bacon
SkUG >_O i got a couple of stitches in my eyeball... ow,
Mon 19 May 2008, 20:44,
archived)
That's all very well,but the crystal would react to radiation coming from all angles, so it'd light up indiscriminately all over all the time.
...Needs a lens in front, possibly.
(,
Mon 19 May 2008, 20:46,
archived)
...Needs a lens in front, possibly.
This is also true.You'd need another collimator on the front, then.
I appreciate these glasses are becoming rather chunky and inefficient.
(I appreciate these glasses are becoming rather chunky and inefficient.
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Mon 19 May 2008, 20:49,
archived)
chunkiness is not an issue SkUG >_O i got a couple of stitches in my eyeball... ow,
Mon 19 May 2008, 21:05,
archived)
no i mean i want to see radiationthe waves n all
( SkUG >_O i got a couple of stitches in my eyeball... ow,
Mon 19 May 2008, 20:27,
archived)
Ah.I suggest asking happytoast to make a nice animation of it.
( my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Mon 19 May 2008, 20:29,
archived)
scieneces suck :( SkUG >_O i got a couple of stitches in my eyeball... ow,
Mon 19 May 2008, 20:41,
archived)