
crossfire ( sli ) HD3850's in this and could go quad now but there is no real reason. two 21" cad monitors to work on and an LCD 32" in the corner of the room for TV ( linked as a 3rd monitor for DVD viewing and the like ) is more than enough for me )
The computer in the other room with the 28" LCD is something I hardly sit at, I certainly can't photoshop on it, too shitty an image )
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 22:42,
archived)
The computer in the other room with the 28" LCD is something I hardly sit at, I certainly can't photoshop on it, too shitty an image )

I found it quite nice, but they got binned ages ago
I'm looking at some cheapy 24" 1900x1200 or something monitors but like.. well compared to what I'm staring at right now I know they'll suck ass
you should be able to get.. um.. 5120x3200 or something with your setup?
in the main I'd be using it for "an thing per screen" as it were so the ultimate resolution is less important than the number of screens
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 22:50,
archived)
I'm looking at some cheapy 24" 1900x1200 or something monitors but like.. well compared to what I'm staring at right now I know they'll suck ass
you should be able to get.. um.. 5120x3200 or something with your setup?
in the main I'd be using it for "an thing per screen" as it were so the ultimate resolution is less important than the number of screens

stretch across screen so a large resolution is not what I'm after, as you say, it's having multiple applications open that matter. And I've just been looking I can get 2048X1536 on a single. I'm sure I can get a great deal more on a big LCD in HD mode. That's not something I've tried yet.
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 22:54,
archived)

I know the dell & apple expensive stuff will do that with no bother
but i'm pretty sure your cards'll do 2560x1600 or so per head
unforunately... the price you pay for them (in general) isn't an indicator of what resolution they'll do :D
edit: the monitors, that is
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 22:57,
archived)
but i'm pretty sure your cards'll do 2560x1600 or so per head
unforunately... the price you pay for them (in general) isn't an indicator of what resolution they'll do :D
edit: the monitors, that is

turned on so it's probably a limitation of my monitors. I probably would get more at 85Hz ( that above was at 200Hz )
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 22:59,
archived)

but still, number of heads more useful than basic resolution
oh, and when I say multihead, I mean stuff like this
tho that's just for unix systems, there's software that lets you achieve a similar effect on windows but it's name escapes me at the moment
edit: http://www.maxivista.com/
as used by this chap
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 23:06,
archived)
oh, and when I say multihead, I mean stuff like this
tho that's just for unix systems, there's software that lets you achieve a similar effect on windows but it's name escapes me at the moment
edit: http://www.maxivista.com/
as used by this chap

you are up against having pinpoint resolution on crt but with big break up ( from the cases ) between screens or sacrificing picture quality for LCD to get a video wall. To be honest the cost is not worth it when a projector will do the job.
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 23:13,
archived)

depending on the use cases the borders either do or don't matter
I'm certain completely seamless is available but the price will be in take the piss territory
there's always multiple projectors for a video wall of course but then there's the multiples of calibration that has to be done
it's one of these things where if you really need it, you need it, as it were, I'd be happy for a few lcd's on this desk because the crts just take up too much space I don't do any graphical work where absolute accuracy matters that much and the eda stuff I want to do I know I'll be able to get away with
of course, if you really want to take the piss there's stuff like http://www.fogscreen.com/en/index.html
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 23:18,
archived)
I'm certain completely seamless is available but the price will be in take the piss territory
there's always multiple projectors for a video wall of course but then there's the multiples of calibration that has to be done
it's one of these things where if you really need it, you need it, as it were, I'd be happy for a few lcd's on this desk because the crts just take up too much space I don't do any graphical work where absolute accuracy matters that much and the eda stuff I want to do I know I'll be able to get away with
of course, if you really want to take the piss there's stuff like http://www.fogscreen.com/en/index.html

and I do like a good display but there is a point where I have to be practical because at the end of the day apart from a few accounts and invoices I do no work at home on a PC.
I'm just not a fan of LCD for computer use ( and that includes the best Samsung screens you will find available today ) I have a large desk and room to extend it ( it used to be 14 feet long in my last place ) if I need it so big CRTs still have plenty of toom for all my other shit and beer cans.
I do have an old Sanyo projector that I've been meaning to try when I get a new bulb but I have a family that keeps interfering with my geekery.
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 23:25,
archived)
I'm just not a fan of LCD for computer use ( and that includes the best Samsung screens you will find available today ) I have a large desk and room to extend it ( it used to be 14 feet long in my last place ) if I need it so big CRTs still have plenty of toom for all my other shit and beer cans.
I do have an old Sanyo projector that I've been meaning to try when I get a new bulb but I have a family that keeps interfering with my geekery.

:D
tho I actually need lcd's quality notwithstanding, even my little monitor is over half the width of the desk :D
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 23:31,
archived)
tho I actually need lcd's quality notwithstanding, even my little monitor is over half the width of the desk :D

as I'm actually on the 21" CRT right now ( because lets face it, LCD monitors are fucking shit if you want to do any detail work )
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 22:39,
archived)

sadly I can't afford lcd's that'll do this res
and the ones that "almost" do a decent res on the cheap are well.. kak in the main
couple of dell panels or apple studio displays is the way to go of course :D
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 22:42,
archived)
and the ones that "almost" do a decent res on the cheap are well.. kak in the main
couple of dell panels or apple studio displays is the way to go of course :D

could do away with a keyboard alltogether with those if they are multitouch
I imagine the really good ones are a good few £K
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 22:52,
archived)
I imagine the really good ones are a good few £K

£3k when I enquired ( they are a Wacom reseller ) but I have seen them on ebay for a disturbing £1700/1800 and that's disturbing. I'm going to have one, I just have to convince the wife.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE2APo_EORQ
How can you not need one of these after seeing that?
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 22:57,
archived)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE2APo_EORQ
How can you not need one of these after seeing that?

"would you believe it dear it only cost £300"
of course, she'll know you're lying and no doubt maim you :D
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 23:01,
archived)
of course, she'll know you're lying and no doubt maim you :D

I already spent on a silly "drawing pad" was a colossal waste of cash. I'll never run it by her.
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 23:03,
archived)

so you are going to buy the £3k one anyway and await the inevitable maiming? :D
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 23:07,
archived)

not have a cintiq now. I might try and settle for a 12 WX but seriously? I can see me having a 21UX by the end of the year.
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 23:10,
archived)

:D
ah well, when it all appears at the tate you can have the last laugh
but then I want to see a b3ta exhibition at the tate anyway :D
( ,
Sat 24 May 2008, 23:21,
archived)
ah well, when it all appears at the tate you can have the last laugh
but then I want to see a b3ta exhibition at the tate anyway :D