you could genuinely question whether the characters having sex look too youngthis is a dodgy law they are trying to bring in. Understandably to stop paedos, but when it comes down to one person deciding whether something that has been drawn by someone else is good or bad...... I'd be a touch worried if I'd drawn so many yiff tastic pictures with big man animals and soapy tits.
(
HappyToast Groat froth,
Wed 28 May 2008, 16:30,
archived)
so you're worried about your private collection then? ;)
ahhh.... *thinks about big soapy tits for a minute*
(ahhh.... *thinks about big soapy tits for a minute*
Thor_sonofodin has done things, terrible things on,
Wed 28 May 2008, 16:33,
archived)
When I heard it on the radio this morning I did immediately wonder if my B3ta folder needed checking Gary Glitter images are probably out off limits now.
So not all bad :D
(So not all bad :D
HappyToast Groat froth,
Wed 28 May 2008, 16:35,
archived)
this bit confused meThe Obscene Publications Act makes it illegal to sell or distribute photos of child abuse but it is legal to own drawings and computer-generated images
i guess images are ok as long as you keep them to yourself.
(i guess images are ok as long as you keep them to yourself.
god save the queen making another unremarkable comeback,
Wed 28 May 2008, 16:44,
archived)