maybe not for much longer tho...
have you used Indesign yet?
Actually quark is quite good, just version 5 was a bit arse.
( ,
Tue 25 Feb 2003, 15:26,
archived)
Actually quark is quite good, just version 5 was a bit arse.
V4
for me, and I can't see nout wrong with it - I've not tried In-Design, good?
( ,
Tue 25 Feb 2003, 15:28,
archived)
allegedly pretty good,
proper beziers and layers and that kind of thing. Sounds like kind of a illustrator/p-shop/quark mish mash. Also it's already OSX native. Not used it yet, but Glamour has always been done in indesign in this country, apparantly, so it must work ok.
/nerdy girl.
( ,
Tue 25 Feb 2003, 15:30,
archived)
/nerdy girl.
indesign
is good.
I mean it's designed by people who actually have a clue about interface design AND can program software that actually works.
oh and it's 1/4 of the cost of Quark.
( ,
Tue 25 Feb 2003, 15:32,
archived)
I mean it's designed by people who actually have a clue about interface design AND can program software that actually works.
oh and it's 1/4 of the cost of Quark.
do you use it?
i don't do as much print these days so only use quark now and again, let alone anything else. I kind of need a job to use it for, if you see what i mean.
ooh - anyone want to give me any freelance print work ;)
( ,
Tue 25 Feb 2003, 15:35,
archived)
ooh - anyone want to give me any freelance print work ;)