It does seem to be only one or two biased sources.
It's interesting for something so relatively recent.
(Rev. Cleostill alive,
Mon 16 Jun 2008, 22:47,
archived)
It makes more logical sense that it was nonsense attributed to someone who actually existed though.
Otherwise Christianity would have been really easy to disprove back nearer its roots. Seeing as no-one ever remembered him.
(JeruWar and Piss,
Mon 16 Jun 2008, 22:36,
archived)
the work of the vatican
put pay to all that, they have covered it all up. The odd thing is i am interested in medieval ecclesiastical life, but i don't believe in any religion
(Duke Otterbyyou pre-verts,
Mon 16 Jun 2008, 22:39,
archived)
Many popes were utterly nuts.
(Rev. Cleostill alive,
Mon 16 Jun 2008, 22:43,
archived)
Nah, it's all plagarised.
Do you like greek myths?
(Rev. Cleostill alive,
Mon 16 Jun 2008, 22:39,
archived)
i like mythology of all sorts
yes you can see the bible as mythology
(Duke Otterbyyou pre-verts,
Mon 16 Jun 2008, 22:40,
archived)
The bible is an interesting read.
But I prefer the lego interpretation.
(Rev. Cleostill alive,
Mon 16 Jun 2008, 22:43,
archived)
Share to
Hide / Ignore
Hide
If you want to unhide this post later, click the "update profile" link in the top navigation bar, and scroll down to the bottom.
Ignore
You will be blisfully unaware of this user for just one week