Hahaha.
I'm writing a vaguely serious albeit ridiculous article about the discordance in free expression between faithed and secular people, citing examples of religious free expression which are exempt from dress codes as opposed to the none secular examples.
You have no idea how tempting it is to draw a picture of a woman walking into work wearing a Muhammed bomb as one of the illustrations. Damn you b3ta!
( ,
Tue 5 Aug 2008, 2:56,
archived)
I'm writing a vaguely serious albeit ridiculous article about the discordance in free expression between faithed and secular people, citing examples of religious free expression which are exempt from dress codes as opposed to the none secular examples.
You have no idea how tempting it is to draw a picture of a woman walking into work wearing a Muhammed bomb as one of the illustrations. Damn you b3ta!
Arts sake I suppose.
Given that my own power of self publication is at best limited.
I honestly can't think of anything to draw for the two illustrations now, they're usually something silly but this was unnaturally serious which makes things difficult.
( ,
Tue 5 Aug 2008, 3:01,
archived)
I honestly can't think of anything to draw for the two illustrations now, they're usually something silly but this was unnaturally serious which makes things difficult.
are you after using your own stuff?
if not, the one that got printed in that magazine that started all the ruckus might work
( ,
Tue 5 Aug 2008, 3:05,
archived)
Well the illustration I did for the last article was a adult cowboy riding one of those electric kids rides you get outside supermarkets.
Except the little pay bit said LIFE, and he was riding a coffin.
( ,
Tue 5 Aug 2008, 3:10,
archived)
for a moment there i read that as 'electric kids'
honestly, i don't know, but i'd be keen to read when it's finished
( ,
Tue 5 Aug 2008, 3:15,
archived)
I've not let anyone from b3ta onto the stuff due to writing under a pseudonym.
It's not something I really want to associate with, not because it's necessarily offensive but because it's that sort of satire you want to base purely on the fictional characters you write which are writing it.
Also I just thought about a girl's ample chest with a cross dangling across the cleavage, but with an actual struggling dying Jesus bleeding into her cleavage. But I think that's a bit strong, plus it would mean having a massive cross on the page which isn't great either.
( ,
Tue 5 Aug 2008, 3:21,
archived)
Also I just thought about a girl's ample chest with a cross dangling across the cleavage, but with an actual struggling dying Jesus bleeding into her cleavage. But I think that's a bit strong, plus it would mean having a massive cross on the page which isn't great either.
draw a man nailing his cock to a table
thas how i free up my expression any way.
( ,
Tue 5 Aug 2008, 3:06,
archived)
Is that one of those vague statements which only really makes tertially level innuendo sense?
Because if it is...*shakes fist*
That's a signifier that I'd punch you...not wank you off.
( ,
Tue 5 Aug 2008, 3:08,
archived)
That's a signifier that I'd punch you...not wank you off.
I just remember it as an extreme example of freedom of expression
while i was studying philosophy. positing the question how far does freedom of expression go.
I felt people should be allowed to nail their cock to things in the street if they so wished as the punishment is kinda implicit in the action.
( ,
Tue 5 Aug 2008, 3:25,
archived)
I felt people should be allowed to nail their cock to things in the street if they so wished as the punishment is kinda implicit in the action.