That's more evidence for evolution than for creation, though.Evolution can't work miracles, but a god can, so why would it create animals with useless bits?
(
Bob Todd whee,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 21:23,
archived)
Aesthetics.
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 21:27,
archived)
to cover his tracks, the devious cuntnipples and fossils will damn you all to hell
(
mictoboy shitting in your cunt since,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 21:31,
archived)
I'm sure a creationist would argue some nonsense about not wanting everything to be easyor because it would prove his existance.
Strange how they can't prove his existance and don't want to, but say all Darwinists have to prove evolution.
(Strange how they can't prove his existance and don't want to, but say all Darwinists have to prove evolution.
HappyToast Groat froth,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 21:32,
archived)
That's kind of the point in faith.Science on the other hand, does need evidence.
( my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 21:37,
archived)
i started typing then realisedthat i couldn't be arsed getting into this debate :)
( mictoboy shitting in your cunt since,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 21:40,
archived)
As if you can resist it. my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 21:42,
archived)
i know my opinionthat'll do for quarter to ten on a sunday night
( mictoboy shitting in your cunt since,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 21:45,
archived)