b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 8704083 (Thread)

# we all mature differently.
i just get chafed when 'sex crimes' are bandied about, for two main reasons:

1. nonsense ones (regarding consensual intergenerational sex and other 'crimes') distract from real sex crimes, and

2. the wingnuts most up in arms about them tend to be puritanical freaks who'll only be happy when only monogamous sex between legally married opposite-gender religious people is allowed.
(I helped save b3ta! postbear has metal knees, Tue 2 Sep 2008, 3:23, archived)
# couldn't agree more!
 
also - those same wingnuts are the ones raping their own children, nightly
(I helped save b3ta! Rapitinui get in the cage and I'll give you a treat, Tue 2 Sep 2008, 3:24, archived)
# They're the kind of middle class white people who get up in arms at potentially racist remarks.
OH MY, YOU CAN'T SAY THAT, SOMEONE MIGHT BE OFFENDED.

Well, how about this. WE LET THE PEOPLE THAT MIGHT BE OFFENDED TELL US IF IT'S OFFENSIVE SINCE YOU HAVE NO FUCKING VIEWPOINT, YOU SPANNER.
(I helped save b3ta! MrPineapple .co.uk - TSHIRTS FOR SALE. I GIVE YOU GOOD PRICE., Tue 2 Sep 2008, 3:25, archived)
# also, glitter was given to the catholics at age 10.
oh, i'd comment but it's just too easy.
(I helped save b3ta! postbear has metal knees, Tue 2 Sep 2008, 3:26, archived)
# I couldn't disagree more.
"In 1999, Glitter was convicted of downloading four thousand images of child pornography."

wingnuts..

you deluded people.
(I helped save b3ta! PointlessCamel Last one on drugs is a queer., Tue 2 Sep 2008, 3:38, archived)
# i'd love to know who the victims of this crime are.
what ages were the people in the images? were they photographs or drawings? were they pics of naked kids that i could easily find on flickr or pbase or yahoo galleries or photobucket or imageshack, etc?

we don't know the facts at all, and that makes your comment absurd. you're probably afraid of ghosts, too.
(I helped save b3ta! postbear has metal knees, Tue 2 Sep 2008, 3:47, archived)
# Oh and so now you are generalising about me,
AND passing off child porn as a 'mild case' or so it seems.

Having 4000 pictures of naked kids on your laptop is not right, whatever the fucking media they are made with.
(I helped save b3ta! PointlessCamel Last one on drugs is a queer., Tue 2 Sep 2008, 3:51, archived)
# you don't know what those pics featured any more than i do.
again: were they drawings? pics of naked kids put up on the internet by moms and dads who think they're cute? actual splayed baby-genitals being licked by adults? we don't know, but they're all illegal in certain places.

by your account it's not right. others disagree, and still others are more worried about the police and government having the right to poke into your computer or desk drawer to see if what gets you off is something that others frown upon.
(I helped save b3ta! postbear has metal knees, Tue 2 Sep 2008, 3:55, archived)
# you know simulated child porno images are actually illegal in the us and a few other countries.
maybe yours?
(I helped save b3ta! d d, Tue 2 Sep 2008, 4:58, archived)
# yes, i do know that. it bothers me, too.
what constitutes porn? it's so bloody subjective that people have been arrested for having snapshots of their own kids in the bath. further, it sparks a chilling effect, and can be used to harass artist and people on the sexual fringe who are not victimising children.
(I helped save b3ta! postbear has metal knees, Tue 2 Sep 2008, 5:05, archived)
# well, all the people I know who were repeatedly raped as children, that was by family members.
 
MANY OF THEM ARE RELIGIOUS, GODDAMNIT
(I helped save b3ta! Rapitinui get in the cage and I'll give you a treat, Tue 2 Sep 2008, 5:24, archived)