nah , he's a tongue on legs,not a talking penis!
(
ivesb Highly specialised Clinical Physiologist crapbag,
Wed 3 Sep 2008, 14:23,
archived)
don't! you're filling my mind with wrongness!a tongue on legs should be the ultimate pleasure device, but not when it's jamie oliver's tongue!
*shudders*
(*shudders*
Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Wed 3 Sep 2008, 14:25,
archived)
A tongue without a face would be awful though...*shudders too*
(
Face will put on her red shoes and nrans the blues,
Wed 3 Sep 2008, 14:27,
archived)
if the tongue had a little face of its ownit wouldn't be so bad. besides, that's what light switches are for!
( Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Wed 3 Sep 2008, 14:28,
archived)
To make it dark so you can't see their face?Also, a tongue with a little face of it's own would be sooo not sexual.
( Face will put on her red shoes and nrans the blues,
Wed 3 Sep 2008, 14:33,
archived)
it's not what it looks likeit's what it can do. have you seen the price of decent D-batteries lately?
( Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Wed 3 Sep 2008, 14:35,
archived)
Like that giant tongue in The Tick."I CAN TASTE YOU"
www.thetick.ws/images/tonguetongue.jpg
He even had his own mouth and tongue, bizaarely.
(,
Wed 3 Sep 2008, 14:30,
archived)
www.thetick.ws/images/tonguetongue.jpg
He even had his own mouth and tongue, bizaarely.
yes.just like that, only smaller.
( Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Wed 3 Sep 2008, 14:48,
archived)