heh ok :)i'll shut up about it now. I've only seen the first 20 minutes or so of the film, tbh. It was at that point that I realised I was actually more bored than I would have been had I just watched the wall for 20 minutes.
(
Lumpbucket tekcubpmuL,
Tue 4 Mar 2003, 15:05,
archived)
oh no - you should see the rest.he changes the burgess' whole fucking point as well as being irritatingly overstylised.
bastard.
(,
Tue 4 Mar 2003, 15:20,
archived)
bastard.
True, most of the book's point is in the second halfand most of that comes across in Alex's thoughts and the motives of the government which Stanley omitted. Stanley also left out the epilogue, which pissed me off.
(,
Tue 4 Mar 2003, 15:25,
archived)
he really wasa cunt.
;)
i was waiting for a 'p.s.' at the end of the film.
(,
Tue 4 Mar 2003, 15:30,
archived)
;)
i was waiting for a 'p.s.' at the end of the film.
The epiloguewasn't in the edition Kubrick read - but he didn't like it when he read it afterwards anyway.
(
Ijon Tichy,
Tue 4 Mar 2003, 15:31,
archived)