needs more depthhere's one I did:
click for big
(
click for big
Haku Orange Whip? Orange Whip? Three Orange Whips.,
Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:37,
archived)
Oh WELL DONE!!Nice to see someone else gets it!
I genuflect to your superior skillz (and I couldn't give it much more depth as the image simple didn't have any to begin with, might select something silly-deep for the next one, like say, ooh, a sea that disappears to the horizon! ;)
(I genuflect to your superior skillz (and I couldn't give it much more depth as the image simple didn't have any to begin with, might select something silly-deep for the next one, like say, ooh, a sea that disappears to the horizon! ;)
..wil,
Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:43,
archived)
easytake two photos of one from slightly ajacent angles
( Haku Orange Whip? Orange Whip? Three Orange Whips.,
Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:54,
archived)
thanksI chose that one because of the levels of depth I could get from it, the alien one does look difficult to turn into a 3d image because there aren't many planes of depth you can recreate
that one did take a bloody long time to split the image up into it's different components though
(that one did take a bloody long time to split the image up into it's different components though
Haku Orange Whip? Orange Whip? Three Orange Whips.,
Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:51,
archived)
Ace, too!Especially glad to see these use the cross-eyed method, I've never been able to master the wall-eyed technique.
(
benryves Now I'm radioactive! That can't be good!,
Sun 12 Oct 2008, 1:03,
archived)