b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 8825152 (Thread)

# Rarrr!


Instructions: stare at the centre between the two pictures, cross your eyes so that you see 3 images, look at the middle one, angle your head side to side till they match up vertically, focus on the resultant 3D picture.

*edit* on Haku's suggestion, have added significantly more depth!

Previous
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:22, archived)
# Ow
Crosseyed = pain :(
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:24, archived)
# soooooorta works
my eye-skills are poor though
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:26, archived)
# Take a break,
have a whisky then try again. You'll get it.
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:34, archived)
# I can never maintain my focus with these
I see a blurry picture in the middle that is probably 3d.
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:26, archived)
# this doesn't work.
i tried animating them together
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:27, archived)
# I can assure you it does,
just not for everyone. Sorry!
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:31, archived)
# only for smart people i see :(
my dad walks around naked, tells me that only smart people can see his cloths all the time :(
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:33, archived)
# Nothing to do with smarts, I guess some folks have conscious control of their eyes
and some don't. Kinda like some folks can twiddle their thumbs in opposite directions I guess...

*edit* might also be to do with whether or not you have 20/20 vision too I guess, which I do as I wear glasses...
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:38, archived)
# Surely everyone can rotate their thumbs in opposites directions, as inately we would do that symetrically.
Getting them to go in the same direction is surely the task.
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:48, archived)
# Mesh your fingers together with palms facing you and enough space that your thumbs don't touch,
rotate thumbs in opposite directions. Helps if you have someone else to see that you actually are as a lot of times when I've shown folks this only they are convinced they're doing it.

I can do this without any thought or struggle, always have been able to, but I've only been able to find maybe 1-2 other people who also can.

Dunno why, just how your made I guess, brain connections and such, mine are pretty 'special' so maybe this is associated in some way?
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 1:13, archived)
# *tries*
Some people can't do that?

edit: Wait, I was doing it wrong. Ignore me.
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 1:16, archived)
# I believe I saw this on 'How' on TV in the '70s first, they said nobody could do it and I tried and could do it easily and thought 'You people talk poo!'
then in school the next day everyone was trying to do it and no one could, so I showed them I could and I was a playground freakshow from there on!

Actually one or two kids managed to teach themselves how to do it after much practice, which is interesting, if still rather pointless...
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 1:32, archived)
# This...
...is the best one yet.

is slightly biased because I suggested it...
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:28, archived)
# wow these are brill
please tell us how you do them
I tiled this as my desktop that really screwed with my eyes
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:30, archived)
# Don't you need to have two shots taken from slightly different angles?
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:32, archived)
# that is what I thought
but will appears to have made these from static images i.e. the star wars poster
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:37, archived)
# I just 'get' how 3D stereoscopics works, always did, and fake it by selecting various parts of the image and warping or moving them separately,
I find it very easy to look at these and can happily stare at it in 3D the whole time I'm making them, so it's just a case of fiddling till it looks right basically!
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:37, archived)
# you are very clever I envy your skill
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:39, archived)
# But I have a wonky eye!! :( :(
Plz tilt the right image to the left precisely 3.4 degrees -- thx :)
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:31, archived)
# Here you go
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:36, archived)
# wow!
that actually worked :D :D
Thanks
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:38, archived)
# LOL!
Well done! :D
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:40, archived)
# I see
a cancer.
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:31, archived)
# Sorta.
It only works if I zoom out far enough that it's too small to be impressive.
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:31, archived)
# where's a tobiacid solideye when you need one eh?
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:32, archived)
# needs more depth
here's one I did:

click for big
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:37, archived)
# That sir
is truly fucking amazing. Big well done!
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:41, archived)
# Oh WELL DONE!!
Nice to see someone else gets it!

I genuflect to your superior skillz (and I couldn't give it much more depth as the image simple didn't have any to begin with, might select something silly-deep for the next one, like say, ooh, a sea that disappears to the horizon! ;)
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:43, archived)
# Oo! Oooo!
Do a rubik's cube next!!!
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:49, archived)
# easy
take two photos of one from slightly ajacent angles
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:54, archived)
# thanks
I chose that one because of the levels of depth I could get from it, the alien one does look difficult to turn into a 3d image because there aren't many planes of depth you can recreate

that one did take a bloody long time to split the image up into it's different components though
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:51, archived)
# Ace, too!
Especially glad to see these use the cross-eyed method, I've never been able to master the wall-eyed technique.
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 1:03, archived)
# nice one
just a tip for any other speccy b3tans who are having trouble with this - I couldn't get it to work til I took my glasses off, may wish to give that a try if you're having problems.
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:46, archived)
# Woo, very nicely done!
Here's a cack-handed attempt from a while back:
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:46, archived)
# The person in the pink shirt pops forward too much,
otherwise top woo!
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:51, archived)
# Not cack handed at all! Very good!
this and Huka's have made me think: I need to find images with some distance going on!
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:53, archived)
# nope, can't spot any differences
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 0:54, archived)
# Open it in GIMP or summat
chop half off, lay it on top, spack the visibility. You can see the differences.
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 1:04, archived)
# i found it easier to do if i made this smaller


oooh almost got the other one to join up.. but its a sturggle.. i have to seriously fight it and then the images in the middle almost joined but kept drifting apart. lol.. which was trippy enough to watch :D
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 1:08, archived)
# Ctrl + scrollwheel
Ctrl + 0 to reset
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 1:14, archived)
# ooooh
legend :)
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 1:19, archived)
# Cool.
Works.
Don't listen to the spacktards.
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 2:06, archived)
# Hooray for the cross-eyed method
And for the skillz of course...

Anyone having trouble may find it helpful to hold a finger between the monitor and the eyes, focus on the fingertip, then move it back and forth until you get it right... I just cross my eyes a bit, me.
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 3:03, archived)
# my head doesn't do these, but i like aliens.
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 3:08, archived)
# Anaglyph for those with 3Dglasses. Had to brighten for RedGreen.
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 4:00, archived)
# Ooh! How you do that?
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 4:40, archived)
# Magnets, fucking shitty magnets.
Make copy layer, subtract(fill black) green and blue channels.
Same for red on original layer or dup again. Slide to overlay
left and right, use 'lighten' on top layer. Nudge to taste. [/;-D
(, Sun 12 Oct 2008, 5:33, archived)
# !
awesome
(, Thu 16 Oct 2008, 1:39, archived)