I do think. I was in a bad mood this morning.I don't hate either. I dislike you a bit, taking previous evidence into account. I'm not putting you on ignore, because you do post decent pictures now and then when you're not being a dick.
As for your final comments there, about purging hatred, and generalising the psychology of a country, I'm afraid you're showing yourself up a bit.
I've put my point across. I'll try not to upset you again.
(As for your final comments there, about purging hatred, and generalising the psychology of a country, I'm afraid you're showing yourself up a bit.
I've put my point across. I'll try not to upset you again.
drbroon abloooobloobloo,
Fri 17 Oct 2008, 15:14,
archived)
As I say, you do have to try reading things in your own voice.How you can read the sentences: "Unless of course you are Scottish, in which case keep bottling it up. It's for the best." in a serious tone is, to be frank, a little beyond me.
It probably explains why you think I am rude though.
I am not going to stop being a dick though, it is kind of what b3ta is for. I was being enough of a dick to get banned before you even found us.
(It probably explains why you think I am rude though.
I am not going to stop being a dick though, it is kind of what b3ta is for. I was being enough of a dick to get banned before you even found us.
LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Fri 17 Oct 2008, 15:20,
archived)
I didn't say you should stop it.But you shouldn't be so surprised when people are dicks to you in return.
I think my interpretation of that sentence was quite accurate. I think your words might have been the problem there.
I also think that you are slightly deluded about your ability to convey "tone" in your writing. If I read it in my own voice, whether in a neutral, angry, happy, cheeky, surprised or disgusted tone, the meaning remains the same. As we were not currently engaged in a particularly friendly discourse, I understood the tone to be negative, irrelevant and pathetic, rather than jokey, cheeky, flirtatious, or whatever it was supposed to be.
Anyway, that's me. It was a fairly interesting discussion.
(I think my interpretation of that sentence was quite accurate. I think your words might have been the problem there.
I also think that you are slightly deluded about your ability to convey "tone" in your writing. If I read it in my own voice, whether in a neutral, angry, happy, cheeky, surprised or disgusted tone, the meaning remains the same. As we were not currently engaged in a particularly friendly discourse, I understood the tone to be negative, irrelevant and pathetic, rather than jokey, cheeky, flirtatious, or whatever it was supposed to be.
Anyway, that's me. It was a fairly interesting discussion.
drbroon abloooobloobloo,
Fri 17 Oct 2008, 15:33,
archived)
It's not so much my ability to convey tone, as the subject.Maybe it is just that I cannot imagine ever saying something that vitriolic seriously. I guess I am just nicer than some people you know.
( LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Fri 17 Oct 2008, 15:37,
archived)