yes.your point seems to be 'two wrongs make a right'
That happened for that compo. It was daft, but fairly humourous.
Doing it again for another compo, when the novelty is long gone, and it's not even a good idea for a compo, is what is the problem, I think.
Anyway, tally ho.
(That happened for that compo. It was daft, but fairly humourous.
Doing it again for another compo, when the novelty is long gone, and it's not even a good idea for a compo, is what is the problem, I think.
Anyway, tally ho.
drbroon abloooobloobloo,
Thu 30 Oct 2008, 15:59,
archived)
Well yes, I agree,but that doesn't mean I can't join in, however feebly.
I'm not being a cunt, it's just an internet forum.
A little "c" on a post should hardly make a difference.
(I'm not being a cunt, it's just an internet forum.
A little "c" on a post should hardly make a difference.
ClanSoul,
Thu 30 Oct 2008, 16:02,
archived)
I'm not sure what you think you're joining in with.I haven't seen others compoing their noncompo related posts for this compo.
I don't care enough now. I'm off.
(I don't care enough now. I'm off.
drbroon abloooobloobloo,
Thu 30 Oct 2008, 16:06,
archived)