
he was referring to her sport in a whimsical way - they do know each other quite well - and not directly about her. It probably never even occured
to him until afterwards what had been said and the way it could have been taken, hence the swift apology.
It's not like Brundle a few months ago and his 'pikey' comment, which was obviously directed at a group
( ,
Mon 10 Nov 2008, 15:32,
archived)
to him until afterwards what had been said and the way it could have been taken, hence the swift apology.
It's not like Brundle a few months ago and his 'pikey' comment, which was obviously directed at a group

Disciplinary-wise.... not linchings by pikeys....
( ,
Mon 10 Nov 2008, 15:38,
archived)

Who decides that words are suddenly wrong? It's language for fuck's sake. Gypsies have always been called Pikeys in some areas. The same as Pakis have always been called Pakis, especially within their own communities.
Words are not insulting and rarely derogatory, it's the context in which someone uses them that gives them vehemence.
( ,
Mon 10 Nov 2008, 15:48,
archived)
Words are not insulting and rarely derogatory, it's the context in which someone uses them that gives them vehemence.

with old folk. They don't know the PC 'rules' and just go about their business every day.
My father still has a rather embarrassing trait of referring to his long, long time West Indian mate as "that black bastard". ( in his company I hasten to add ) and neither of them seem to have an issue with it or understand that anyone else might. ( the gentleman in question is just as incredibly un-pc in his conversation too )
( ,
Mon 10 Nov 2008, 15:41,
archived)
My father still has a rather embarrassing trait of referring to his long, long time West Indian mate as "that black bastard". ( in his company I hasten to add ) and neither of them seem to have an issue with it or understand that anyone else might. ( the gentleman in question is just as incredibly un-pc in his conversation too )