b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 8989027 (Thread)

# Why would you even care?
They're both dead. And severely over-rated.
(, Tue 2 Dec 2008, 11:40, archived)
# i haven't been picked on for looking like john lennon
(, Tue 2 Dec 2008, 11:44, archived)
# Oh look everyone, it's John Lennon!
*points and laughs*

Hey, hippy! Give us a song!
(, Tue 2 Dec 2008, 11:49, archived)
# I think the rules of being an atheist as defined by Dawkins require
"JESUS IS SHIT LOL" whenever the chance arises.

pip pip jpg.
(, Tue 2 Dec 2008, 11:45, archived)
# This
Watching him get stitched by a 16 year old was fun.

"I don't want to be told what to think ..."

"Oh I'm not telling you what to think, I'm just saying ... look at the evidence ... and you'll see ... that evolution is the best answer ..."

"But that's telling me what to think ..."
(, Tue 2 Dec 2008, 11:50, archived)
# I agree with much of the science behind him.
He just doesn't seem to fully understand it though, and doesn't understand the psychology of the situation. He's a sociologist or a social theorist, not a scientist or a psychologist.

I'm a psychologist. I'll tell the bible-bashing cunts and hectoring atheists what to think. Shut up Dawkins, you fucking rich waffly cunt.
(, Tue 2 Dec 2008, 11:56, archived)
# Hahahahaha all of this.
We are looking at the battle of the men in white coats vs the men in black dresses.
(, Tue 2 Dec 2008, 12:00, archived)
# yes
precisely. It's not a battle of the foppish man with a pringle jumper, polo shirt, cords and opinions vs the men in black dresses.
(, Tue 2 Dec 2008, 12:05, archived)
# Perhaps you'd like him better if he reinvented himself as a mockney?
(, Tue 2 Dec 2008, 12:14, archived)
# haha
that would be excellent.
(, Tue 2 Dec 2008, 12:15, archived)
# I prefered the JC's close harmony, personally
(, Tue 2 Dec 2008, 11:48, archived)