
edit : *clicks link above* that 'description' gave me a headache... simpleton version please?
( ,
Fri 23 Jan 2009, 19:52,
archived)

Preferably famous, but random mates of yours that we have never seen before are cool too.
( ,
Fri 23 Jan 2009, 19:55,
archived)

Sadly it was this one. We even did 2 two option pole as we were bored between this and barbs which was Unusual charities and it kebab's lost even then!
I think this compo is utter, utter shite and excludes a large amount of messagebaord source.
( ,
Fri 23 Jan 2009, 19:55,
archived)
I think this compo is utter, utter shite and excludes a large amount of messagebaord source.

The compo isn't shit, it is merely that morons don't bother reading the description, see a couple of entries and make up their own compo that fits in with the couple of pics they have seen.
( ,
Fri 23 Jan 2009, 19:58,
archived)

compo, because people will have to think a bit before entering. Or at least you would think they would....
( ,
Fri 23 Jan 2009, 20:04,
archived)

But you didnt just post a pic of a famous person did you :)
( ,
Fri 23 Jan 2009, 20:05,
archived)

because people will have to think a bit before entering. Or at least you would think they would....
( ,
Fri 23 Jan 2009, 20:06,
archived)

The best one in a very, very long time. Sadly the problem lies with the entrants, who are dull-witted retards unable to ( as per usual ) read the challenge and comprehend that posting ( or reposting ) a picture of a famous person does not fit the brief in the slightest.
fuck off half-wits. Caricature!

( ,
Fri 23 Jan 2009, 20:05,
archived)
fuck off half-wits. Caricature!
