I don't support allowing it into the cycle untested, as they have done now.
(,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:54,
archived)
FEV. Speed up evolution. Humans aren't going to evolve without it.
(,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:57,
archived)
the reason people protested was because the government tried to sneak it past them, there wasn't a debate and the scientific evidence wasn't made public
(,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:59,
archived)
In the 80's one such supplimet killed over 100 people and caused up to another 10,000 people to fall ill in the US.
(,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:02,
archived)
before release.
Not that we have a choice now.
(,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:11,
archived)
Not that we have a choice now.
the great unwashed are excluded from debates such as this.
(,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:16,
archived)
And how is a food supplement a GMO crop. The WHO only shows the passed GMO foods in use as having insect resistance and herbicide tolerance bred into them.
Canada and the US bred Virus resistance into Squashes as well.
(,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:11,
archived)
Canada and the US bred Virus resistance into Squashes as well.
but your mind appears made up.
I'll just say this. Genetically engineered bacteria and genetically modified crops ( which we were discussing ) are not the same fields and have no relation to each other barring the vast umbrella of 'genetics'
(,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:31,
archived)
I'll just say this. Genetically engineered bacteria and genetically modified crops ( which we were discussing ) are not the same fields and have no relation to each other barring the vast umbrella of 'genetics'