Proper atheism is apatheticit is most often truly defined by lack of faith and a not belong to an organised religion.
Dawkins' brand of hectoring, rabble-raising atheism is however nothing I wish to be part of. He seems to think that creating a collective conscience of atheism will be helpful. I prefer to form and hold my own opinions based on my own personal analysis of information I come into contact with. Dawkins, whether he knows it or not (and I dare say he knows fine well) is constructing a brand of atheism that reeks of organised religion, and for that reason, rather than his good arguments against religion, he can take a running fuck up himself and take all the other hectoring intolerant cunts with him.
(Dawkins' brand of hectoring, rabble-raising atheism is however nothing I wish to be part of. He seems to think that creating a collective conscience of atheism will be helpful. I prefer to form and hold my own opinions based on my own personal analysis of information I come into contact with. Dawkins, whether he knows it or not (and I dare say he knows fine well) is constructing a brand of atheism that reeks of organised religion, and for that reason, rather than his good arguments against religion, he can take a running fuck up himself and take all the other hectoring intolerant cunts with him.
drbroon abloooobloobloo,
Thu 12 Feb 2009, 9:27,
archived)
Dawkins has (if you ignore is religion baiting) done some very serious work on evolution.
Mu Dinofiddler,
Thu 12 Feb 2009, 9:31,
archived)