![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
but even still the integers thing just seems, not counter intuitive, but bollocks.
Oh concept, if between 1 and 2 there are an infinite amount of decimals (wrong word?) you would never actually get to two for two to exist therefore there couldn't be the other infinity.
( ,
Wed 25 Feb 2009, 20:30,
archived)
Oh concept, if between 1 and 2 there are an infinite amount of decimals (wrong word?) you would never actually get to two for two to exist therefore there couldn't be the other infinity.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
it arises because people mistake counting for mathematics. just because you can't count everything between a and b, it doesn't follow that you can't reach b from a
think about it like a cake. if i cut it in half, it's still the same mass of cake. if i cut the halves in half, it's still the same mass of cake. if i repeat this infinitely, it's still the same mass of cake (except at some point we start splitting the atom and singe our eyebrows)
( ,
Wed 25 Feb 2009, 20:42,
archived)
think about it like a cake. if i cut it in half, it's still the same mass of cake. if i cut the halves in half, it's still the same mass of cake. if i repeat this infinitely, it's still the same mass of cake (except at some point we start splitting the atom and singe our eyebrows)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
But it still doesn;t work for me. the one to two problem is that you have to accept that there is a two. but we don't think of infinity having a point that starts something else, lets call it infinity 2.
Thanks for answering my questions though. :)
( ,
Wed 25 Feb 2009, 20:49,
archived)
Thanks for answering my questions though. :)