b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9246270 (Thread)

# 7
You don't have a problem with building 7 falling? And you are an architect?

This group is called Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth, and here is their study of Building 7
www.ae911truth.org/wtc7.php

Curious what you think of this.

.
(, Sat 7 Mar 2009, 11:49, archived)
# Shut up and draw us a kitten
Just have fun with it man, that's all we ask. Have fun with it!

.

.
(, Sat 7 Mar 2009, 11:50, archived)
# as I said before, up above,. before you deleted the sub-thread:
an architectural technologist, if you read the reply correctly.

and I have not said ANYWHERE I don't have a problem with building 7 falling.
That's two innacuracies you've made in the first sentence.
I stated that fires were reported all aternoon from floors 6 through to 30+,
That's the rub of it, people so fixed on these conspiracies often put words into the mouths of others. Funny that.
I've seen that site, and prefer this one:
www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
among many others which deal with what can be quantified, and not hypothesised.
they also factor in the 'human' element as well.
and as I've had this conversation before many times on b3ta,
I won't be having it again.
B3ta is not the place for this sort of thing, there are dedicated forums for such discussions, as I have also stated below.
(just a personal opinion, as MOUIAP rightly directs me to point out below)
Thanks for the invitation to reply with what i think, but no thanks. It's not what I come to b3ta for.
Cheers, and no malice meant against you or what you might believe :)

.
(, Sat 7 Mar 2009, 11:52, archived)
# One of the things I like about b3ta is that just about anything can be discussed here.
(, Sat 7 Mar 2009, 11:54, archived)
# yup, it can be I guess, maybe I'm overstepping it by suggesting its not the sort of place for such things
apologies for that. :)

Just a personal wrangle I guess. Have edited above to reflect your rather well made point :)
(, Sat 7 Mar 2009, 11:55, archived)
# I can see where you're coming from, I know plenty of people don't want 'serious' discussions on here.
I'd say just don't get involved in the bits you don't like, but I guess that gets tricky when there are sprawling arguments all over the board
(, Sat 7 Mar 2009, 11:59, archived)
# hehe, yup,
It's why I vowed a while ago not to get too involved in stuff like this

*stops self from going further with it*

I don't mind a reasonable, serious discussion, but we have 'off topic' on here for that sort of long, sprawling thread.

I likes pikchures I does!
(, Sat 7 Mar 2009, 12:01, archived)
# You carry on that way
and you are so gonna get banned! ;)
(, Sat 7 Mar 2009, 11:56, archived)
# If you even try to ban me, I'll ban you so hard.
(, Sat 7 Mar 2009, 12:01, archived)
# Yeah?
Well if you ban me so hard I am so gonna to ban you in the face!
(, Sat 7 Mar 2009, 12:05, archived)
# I see no discussion here
.
.
(, Sat 7 Mar 2009, 11:56, archived)