impending doom? 'war'?
war implies they have some kind of a chance. do you honestly think america would start a war where they didn't outnumber and outgun them 100:1?
( ,
Sun 16 Mar 2003, 21:21,
archived)
I've said that all along..
You can't call it a war unless Iraq does something major, like bombing America, which they won't because they'd be pounced upon by pretty much every other country.
If I'm wrong..so what, I'm just a kid!
( ,
Sun 16 Mar 2003, 21:23,
archived)
If I'm wrong..so what, I'm just a kid!
you can't call it a war
if it'll be over in a month.
america hasn't been involved in a "war" since vietnam, and they're not going to do all that again. britain hasn't since WWII
( ,
Sun 16 Mar 2003, 21:25,
archived)
america hasn't been involved in a "war" since vietnam, and they're not going to do all that again. britain hasn't since WWII
We just had an evacuee from WWII
in our History class...she said it was a right laugh..which makes me think she wasn't really an evacuee...
( ,
Sun 16 Mar 2003, 21:26,
archived)
Actually
She was 4..so yeh...
She did give us all a chocolate egg though so..woo!
( ,
Sun 16 Mar 2003, 21:29,
archived)
She did give us all a chocolate egg though so..woo!
Hey, we had a
"conflict" in '82...might not have been a war but buggered if i'd liked to have been involved.
( ,
Sun 16 Mar 2003, 21:35,
archived)
What about 'nam
They out-numbered and out-gunned and were out-classed.
( ,
Sun 16 Mar 2003, 21:35,
archived)
they learnt their lesson
now it's only wars where they know the others don't stand a chance.
( ,
Sun 16 Mar 2003, 21:38,
archived)
What's awful is
that I don't think there's anything that will stop Bush from punishing Saddam for humiliating his daddy in '91. I think if every single person in America went into the streets and protested, Bush would still attack Iraq. Nobody -- and I mean NOBODY -- that I know is in favor of war. It doesn't seem to matter to Bush.
( ,
Sun 16 Mar 2003, 21:42,
archived)