well it's done nowso just accept the friendly abuse in the manner it's meant
don't do it again
don't delete the thread!
(don't do it again
don't delete the thread!
kingsuperspecial is in an audience, wanking furiously,
Mon 6 Apr 2009, 11:41,
archived)
^ and don't cross the streams
prodigy69 broke b3ta and made everyone leave,
Mon 6 Apr 2009, 11:44,
archived)
Possible daft question then....Wouldn't the board be pushed down by the same amount in image length whether it is a new thread or a reply? Or is the board a XX number of threads rather than actual length of the page?
(,
Mon 6 Apr 2009, 11:52,
archived)
This is true. However, less people tend to reply to a repost.Instead, fail messages appear - adding to the new work being pushed down
(
BargeArse Maker of fine Trouser Trumpets since 1863,
Mon 6 Apr 2009, 11:54,
archived)
AhhSo it's other people replying rather than the actual original poster that causes work to be pushed down? Surely the answer is to not reply with the 'hilarious' you fail comments?
(,
Mon 6 Apr 2009, 11:57,
archived)
I think its a combination.But as you can see many people enjoy posting fail comments. However, the idea is that the offender (whether it be unintentionally or intentionally) won't do it again.
( BargeArse Maker of fine Trouser Trumpets since 1863,
Mon 6 Apr 2009, 12:03,
archived)
15 threads on the page at a time...comments don't do anything prodigy69 broke b3ta and made everyone leave,
Mon 6 Apr 2009, 12:36,
archived)
No.The main page holds 15 threads regardless of the amount of replies.
New threads push someone else's work off into the archive and if it's a repost that we have seen before then it is selfish to do and says not to in the faq.
(New threads push someone else's work off into the archive and if it's a repost that we have seen before then it is selfish to do and says not to in the faq.
Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Mon 6 Apr 2009, 12:08,
archived)