
*context... grumble, grumble... wait for all the facts... grumble grumble...*
( ,
Wed 8 Apr 2009, 14:34,
archived)


Someone forgot to order the entertainment for the protest, so the friendly police stepped in to fill the gap.
( ,
Wed 8 Apr 2009, 14:39,
archived)

Are they telling the crowd to get back?
Is this man ignoring them?
How has he found himself at the front of a crowd of protesters if he's just walking home?
There is no information about this video other than it's turned up, most websites/news programs have edited it to fit the slot and there's no information about where/when/what was happening.
Yet everyone is perfectly happy to draw their own conclusions and have already sent the officers to the stocks.
( ,
Wed 8 Apr 2009, 14:41,
archived)
Is this man ignoring them?
How has he found himself at the front of a crowd of protesters if he's just walking home?
There is no information about this video other than it's turned up, most websites/news programs have edited it to fit the slot and there's no information about where/when/what was happening.
Yet everyone is perfectly happy to draw their own conclusions and have already sent the officers to the stocks.

I'm struggling to come up with an excuse for those kinds of actions though.
( ,
Wed 8 Apr 2009, 14:44,
archived)

the heightened sense of fear on the side of the police that they were outnumbered by people lobbing bottles at them?
( ,
Wed 8 Apr 2009, 15:31,
archived)

I don't think the Police would look kindly on someone pushing over a random person because they're scared of a general situation.
( ,
Wed 8 Apr 2009, 15:33,
archived)

Does marching give them the right to push someone?
Does shouting give them the right to push someone?
Does being ignored give them the right to push someone?
( ,
Wed 8 Apr 2009, 15:10,
archived)
Does shouting give them the right to push someone?
Does being ignored give them the right to push someone?

He wasn't. It was the middle of a protest which was, at times, violent. It's not like he was merrily walking along an empty street and the police set upon him
( ,
Wed 8 Apr 2009, 15:33,
archived)

and decide pushing a random bloke on his face and causing him to die of a heart attack even tho he was walking away from them with his hands in his pockets, then initially lying about it until a film of the event surfaced, was entirely justifiable considering what a great job they do protecting the public and upholding the law...
( ,
Wed 8 Apr 2009, 14:40,
archived)

it hasn't been confirmed that the police caused the heart attack. Granted, it may well be a contributory factor, but it's not fact - yet.
from what I heard it was 10 minutes after this event he actually died from a heart attack. And having a heart attack isn't a 'sudden' thing. The way he was walking/wandering beforehand suggests he may not have been feeling all that well prior to the push. It 'could' have possibly been starting prior to the push, and the push 'may' have exacerbated the situation.
It's unfortunate in any case, and that push was certainly not warranted in the situation, BUT, it may not have been the main contributory factor in the cause of death, that has yet to be determined.
( ,
Wed 8 Apr 2009, 14:55,
archived)
from what I heard it was 10 minutes after this event he actually died from a heart attack. And having a heart attack isn't a 'sudden' thing. The way he was walking/wandering beforehand suggests he may not have been feeling all that well prior to the push. It 'could' have possibly been starting prior to the push, and the push 'may' have exacerbated the situation.
It's unfortunate in any case, and that push was certainly not warranted in the situation, BUT, it may not have been the main contributory factor in the cause of death, that has yet to be determined.