Home » Messageboard »
XXX » Message 9373579
(Thread)
Probably because David Cameron would have to publicly drop-kick the queen not to win the next election.
(
Peter_G,
Sat 18 Apr 2009, 18:25,
archived)
It would get the republican vote
(
Tribs 🦇 ↓ dn ʎɐʍ sᴉɥʇ ↓🦇,
Sat 18 Apr 2009, 18:28,
archived)
*is sad*
(
..wil,
Sat 18 Apr 2009, 18:34,
archived)
^mmhm
(
zoldergoose,
Sat 18 Apr 2009, 18:35,
archived)
why? at the moment
he seems like the lesser of the two evils
(
Peter_G,
Sat 18 Apr 2009, 18:36,
archived)
I take it you weren't there in the '80s?
(
..wil,
Sat 18 Apr 2009, 18:37,
archived)
I take it you vote based on what a party did 30 years ago with a different leader and enviroment?
(
Peter_G,
Sat 18 Apr 2009, 18:38,
archived)
George Osborne said in his Budget Response in 2006, "Budgets aren't just about interest rates."
(
zoldergoose,
Sat 18 Apr 2009, 18:41,
archived)
Yup!
(
..wil,
Sat 18 Apr 2009, 18:41,
archived)
Poor old naivety
(
kinks rock over London, rock on Chicago,
Sat 18 Apr 2009, 18:53,
archived)
Don't get me wrong
I'm not defending the Conservative party, all I'm saying is that at the moment they seem like the lesser of the two evils.
(
Peter_G,
Sat 18 Apr 2009, 18:57,
archived)
Then you don't understand the nature of the Conservative party
(
kinks rock over London, rock on Chicago,
Sat 18 Apr 2009, 19:07,
archived)
yes I do
perhaps you don't understand the nature of new labour
(
Peter_G,
Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:58,
archived)
Hide
If you want to unhide this post later, click the "update profile" link in the top navigation bar, and scroll down to the bottom.
Ignore
You will be blisfully unaware of this user for just one week
You will not see this users messages again
You will not see them and they will not see you