b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9374405 (Thread)

# But Jesus did exist, there can be no question over that.
Whether he was the Son of God is a different matter ;)
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:55, archived)
# Actually there are several questions about that.
A lot of scholars believe that they were lots of different completely seperate acts attributed to one person. The fact that the Jesus story shares and takes from it lots from early Mithratic resurrection stories is not coincidence.
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:57, archived)
# Yeah, the acts,
but the person that is known as Jesus has been proven to exist.
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:59, archived)
# The person known as Jesus did not necessarily exist.
A person called Jesus existed, as do many, it's a fairly popular name.

Seperation of name and concept. A rose known by any other name...and all that jazz.
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:02, archived)
# Obviously this is not definitive, but,
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:07, archived)
# proof, man, i demand PROOF!
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:58, archived)
# They checked the census
and did find a man called Jesus who was Bar Joseph who was crucified. He is pretty much undoubtably the man that is known as Jesus. However, no proof exists of his miracles. Well, apart from the Gospels. And to be fair, wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?o2=&o0=1&o7=&o5=&o1=1&o6=&o4=&o3=&s=gospel+truth
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:02, archived)
# my friend's mum is called mary
she's not jesus' mum or queen of the scots. names are not the property of any one person.
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:05, archived)
# Of course they aren't.
But that isn't what I said and you know it :P
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:07, archived)
# i know, i know
i'm just a great believer in documented hard evidence that can't be discounted in any rational way.
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:13, archived)