b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9374342 (Thread)

# Naaarrggghh!!
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:31, archived)
# oh shit!...
...call Yoko!
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:32, archived)
# i find this more entertaining than the album itself
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:32, archived)
# To some that's akin to blasphemy
(I ain't one of them).
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:34, archived)
# well, they did claim to be bigger than jesus
which is technically correct. if jesus existed, there was only one of him and four of them. put them together, they'd be approximately four times bigger than him.
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:46, archived)
# But Jesus did exist, there can be no question over that.
Whether he was the Son of God is a different matter ;)
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:55, archived)
# Actually there are several questions about that.
A lot of scholars believe that they were lots of different completely seperate acts attributed to one person. The fact that the Jesus story shares and takes from it lots from early Mithratic resurrection stories is not coincidence.
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:57, archived)
# Yeah, the acts,
but the person that is known as Jesus has been proven to exist.
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:59, archived)
# The person known as Jesus did not necessarily exist.
A person called Jesus existed, as do many, it's a fairly popular name.

Seperation of name and concept. A rose known by any other name...and all that jazz.
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:02, archived)
# Obviously this is not definitive, but,
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:07, archived)
# proof, man, i demand PROOF!
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:58, archived)
# They checked the census
and did find a man called Jesus who was Bar Joseph who was crucified. He is pretty much undoubtably the man that is known as Jesus. However, no proof exists of his miracles. Well, apart from the Gospels. And to be fair, wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?o2=&o0=1&o7=&o5=&o1=1&o6=&o4=&o3=&s=gospel+truth
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:02, archived)
# my friend's mum is called mary
she's not jesus' mum or queen of the scots. names are not the property of any one person.
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:05, archived)
# Of course they aren't.
But that isn't what I said and you know it :P
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:07, archived)
# i know, i know
i'm just a great believer in documented hard evidence that can't be discounted in any rational way.
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:13, archived)
# try this version ;)
3 Days of playing around produced this little lot.
Some are quite nice i think, some were very tricky, others dead simple.


www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=f85a2563edbaaa0bab1eab3e9fa335ca7f2f4ecb525fbe49
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:35, archived)
# i'm not much of a fan, to be honest
although i love maxwell's silver hammer
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:45, archived)
# everyone's icons are 404-ing on me
except my candle :(
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:57, archived)
# my bee is invisible?
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:00, archived)
# White question mark on blue box
:(
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:02, archived)
# blue box???
fuck me, my icon has become a tardis!
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:06, archived)
# Mac Safari FAIL
*sigh*
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:08, archived)
# i prefer to believe my icon is a tardis
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:14, archived)
# I d/l'd the cd
yeh mon
I'm skinning up..title track is really nice
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:03, archived)
# lucy in the sky is ace too
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:19, archived)
# day in the life
fantastic version.
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:31, archived)
# thanks!
:) :) :)
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:48, archived)
# >:|
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:46, archived)
# sorry
i just find their music too chirpy and flowery, i prefer rock.
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:48, archived)
# i also like rock
but rock would not exist if it weren't for the beatles
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:53, archived)
# WRONG!
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:56, archived)
# I CHALLENGE YOU TO A BATTLE
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:58, archived)
# Before we begin the battle,
can I just state that I do not at any point doubt the importance of The Beatles in music. However, the majority of their importance is based on the social implications, not the musical innovation that they supposedly created. If you wanna gaz and have a chat with me about it, I would enjoy that. I love arguing about music :D
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:05, archived)
# i agree that their importance is based primarily on the social advances they helped to propagate, but i don't see how that is a bad thing
also, i am probably not entirely capable of a sustained intelligent debate at this hour and in my current state of mind
perhaps some other time though :D

i was brought up listening to the beatles, so my defence of them is probably mostly a knee-jerk reaction (fun fact: i took my username from 'i am the walrus')
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:19, archived)
# I didn't mean it was a bad thing.
However, my main point is that they weren't anywhere near as innnovative as people made them out to be. Undoubtedly the biggest band of all time though, and I think the most important band of all time. However, I myself, like Smash, am not a massive fan.
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:23, archived)
# i appreciate that they are important
to musical history, but that doesn't make me like them any more. it's like football, as soon as people realise that i'm a scouser, they immediately assume that i love football and the beatles.
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:56, archived)
# Yes but football isn't really important or relevent to any development of the social structure or culture of mankind.
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:58, archived)
# it's shit
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:59, archived)
# the beatles have nothing to do with football
unless you mean that you don't like them purely because people expect you to like them
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:01, archived)
# i'm simply saying that
i don't like either of them and it annoys me that, due to ridiculous stereotyping, there will always be people dumbfounded by the fact that a scouser would dislike both these things. i'd dislike them anyway.
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:10, archived)
# fair enough
i don't agree with what you say, but i am prepared to defend your right to say it :D
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:21, archived)
# heheheh
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:25, archived)
# hahaha!
I like how the lag made it slowly start to speed up :D
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:33, archived)
# Imagine...
Thomas had a headache.
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:33, archived)
# hppybtdy!
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:34, archived)
# ythxldsprson :)
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:35, archived)
# Kybrd hs n vwls?
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:35, archived)
# sktch?
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:36, archived)
# BGGL
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:39, archived)
# LL RFL LM
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:41, archived)
# n. vwls r stpd nywy.
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:37, archived)
# s...
...n prblm.
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:43, archived)
# hahahahahahaha!
oh, now i have to watch rex the runt
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:49, archived)
# TUESDAY!
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:53, archived)
# SPAGHETTI!
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:54, archived)
# LAAAAAAAAA_LA_LA_LA_LA_LA_LA_LAAA_LAAA!
Shut it Vince.
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:01, archived)
# it's dr, dog, everybody
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:17, archived)
# Ahahaha
WHAT?
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:34, archived)
# haha YES
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:37, archived)
# Woooo!
Far out man!
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:38, archived)
# hahaha
:D
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:43, archived)
# Haha what! Related:
Jim Carrey Singing "I am the Walrus"
I saw the video on youtube and this is the mp3 with great sound quality.
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:47, archived)
# D:
i don't quite know what to make of that
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:06, archived)
# IT'S EPIC
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:21, archived)
# it walks that delicate tightrope between terrible blasphemy and insane brilliance
i shall listen to it again tomorrow and make up my mind then
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:23, archived)
# legend
this is grand
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:16, archived)
# DANCE TO THE BEAT YOKO BEAT YOKO
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:48, archived)
# LOLWHAT?
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:53, archived)
# :D
that's great
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:54, archived)
# My favourite week ever :D
Such a fun compo :D
(, Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:55, archived)
# YaY!
:)
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:50, archived)
# woah!
trippy
(, Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:16, archived)