
/just a personal opinion only, I might add.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 14:34,
archived)

I'd say a lot of people aren't so much imagining it as they are reading hokum theories on the internet and being gullible enough to believe them
/just a personal opinion only, I might add.
yes, it is not that i can watch the skies daily, and see they spray on some days and not others, or that if is too windy they simply stop spraying in the middle of the day, or that i see them turning the sprayers on and off. No, it is that i read a theory on the internet.
Wow, you are amazing.
And i read your contrail science page there, did you read the comments at the bottom? No one believes any of the crap written, because we have eyes and can see what is happening, but sadly you don't watch the skies. Stay asleep, it is much safer for your fragile mind.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 17:00,
archived)
/just a personal opinion only, I might add.
yes, it is not that i can watch the skies daily, and see they spray on some days and not others, or that if is too windy they simply stop spraying in the middle of the day, or that i see them turning the sprayers on and off. No, it is that i read a theory on the internet.
Wow, you are amazing.
And i read your contrail science page there, did you read the comments at the bottom? No one believes any of the crap written, because we have eyes and can see what is happening, but sadly you don't watch the skies. Stay asleep, it is much safer for your fragile mind.

than look down and know you're grounded.
Selective reading of comments simply because they don't agree with the scientific argument put forward does not constitue scientific evidence for your argument. Please, expand your 'research' to look at the rest of the site. Quite enlightening.
Fragile Mind? Pot, Kettle. Black.
and please, answer my question above which you have conveniently ignored.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 17:28,
archived)
Selective reading of comments simply because they don't agree with the scientific argument put forward does not constitue scientific evidence for your argument. Please, expand your 'research' to look at the rest of the site. Quite enlightening.
Fragile Mind? Pot, Kettle. Black.
and please, answer my question above which you have conveniently ignored.

asked questions and a couple of comments disagreed without offering anything other than blind refusal to accept.
Just because you are not alone in your madness does not make it any more true.
You can't argue with simple scientific law. Well, YOU can, but not with any conviction or substantive fact.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 17:53,
archived)
Just because you are not alone in your madness does not make it any more true.
You can't argue with simple scientific law. Well, YOU can, but not with any conviction or substantive fact.