
Just finished my housework and now sitting with a bowl of chicken soup waiting for the washing machine to finish
O_O
Er, what happened to my life?
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 13:38,
archived)
O_O
Er, what happened to my life?

;-)
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 13:39,
archived)

Work sucks because I've left my lunch at home. I now have to spend money, which I dislike doing.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 13:45,
archived)

While making other images condemning cellphones?
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 13:32,
archived)

apart from the fact there are apparently no ugly women in California it was really quite shit.
Anyone else seen it?
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 13:33,
archived)
Anyone else seen it?

but on the whole I was quite fed up of Timberlake saying mo fo bitch a lot
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 13:50,
archived)

we're in for a soaking:(
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 13:34,
archived)

water vapour has different properties and behaviours at different altitudes, temperatures and air pressures. QUICK TELL THE INTERNETS!
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 13:38,
archived)


your vapours reek, give it up
love the soodough sience. Anything to explain how you are wrong Passy.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 13:42,
archived)
love the soodough sience. Anything to explain how you are wrong Passy.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 13:45,
archived)

I'm quite happy with my understanding of science. Ask yourself why it's always the trails in the upper atmosphere that disperse before the lower ones do. No actually don't ask yourself as you'll come up with some ludicrous, paranoid nonsense. Ask a scientist who will tell you about upper cloud layers burning off first due to a phenomenon knows as "the sun".
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 13:46,
archived)

*runs and screams*
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 13:49,
archived)

no such thing as chemtrails, it is just water vapour at different attitudes.
Wrong, it is caused by pink squirting cocks! I snapped this pic to prove you wrong passy.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 13:52,
archived)
Wrong, it is caused by pink squirting cocks! I snapped this pic to prove you wrong passy.

I've not made any outlandish claims you delusional troll.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 13:54,
archived)

I paid close attention to contrails as a child. I carefully observed every single one I could set my eyeballs on and counted the minutes until they dissapeared. I never saw them behave the way they do today, thick plumes that spread out into a guazy haze that covers the sky. No, not when I was little; they simply did not do that.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 14:25,
archived)

surely, as a child, when there were supposedly no such thing as chemtrails back then (by your own argument above, as these things simply didn't do the same things they do today)
You'd just be happily watching the clouds go by and being a child of the time?
unless you knew something back then, before it happened...
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 14:29,
archived)
You'd just be happily watching the clouds go by and being a child of the time?
unless you knew something back then, before it happened...

because of your cheap plastic watch
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 14:32,
archived)

If you can't accept that weather conditions are rapidly changing at height, colder temperatures cause vapour trails with more condensation in them and that the simple action of the sun and wind makes this vapour behave exactly the same as any other high altitude cirrus clod then you are closed to debate and have no objectivity at all rendering anything you say bias and therefore worthless.
Seriously, it's becoming like harassment now. Leave me the fuck alone. Stop gazzing me, stop sending me emails talking about stupid machines that make you well ( the same machines that are illegal as fraudulent and the maker of those machines this week being sentenced to up to 140 years in jail), about trails of chemicals that do god knows what to us, about Jews not being killed because 60 year old walls are not blue and about there being a new world order taking over humanity. Stop it because quite frankly I hope it's true and the sooner the elite are in charge and the great cull is imposed the sooner I can forget about you.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 14:35,
archived)
Seriously, it's becoming like harassment now. Leave me the fuck alone. Stop gazzing me, stop sending me emails talking about stupid machines that make you well ( the same machines that are illegal as fraudulent and the maker of those machines this week being sentenced to up to 140 years in jail), about trails of chemicals that do god knows what to us, about Jews not being killed because 60 year old walls are not blue and about there being a new world order taking over humanity. Stop it because quite frankly I hope it's true and the sooner the elite are in charge and the great cull is imposed the sooner I can forget about you.

He was the stupid teacher in Harry Potter, wasn't he?
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 15:23,
archived)

I noticed that, but somehow liked it enough not to fix the typo ;)
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 15:26,
archived)

Am I right in saying that these chemtrails are a new thing? Don't people say that they can't remember them as kids so they can't have been there. ( same people also say they can't remember being abducted and probed but never seem to use the same 'never happened then' argument there )
I was pleased to see this image from 1967.
contrailscience.com/wp-content/uploads/cloud-studies-115.jpg
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 14:06,
archived)
I was pleased to see this image from 1967.
contrailscience.com/wp-content/uploads/cloud-studies-115.jpg

I wonder what that was, because chemtrail studies must have been developed and tested before, but you cannot provide any photos of normal commercial airliners producing sustained chemtrail criss crosses before 1999.
do it.
.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 14:14,
archived)
do it.
.

I lived in LA for twenty years, from the early 80's, and i never saw one single chemtrail, then i moved away and since '01 there are tons of them there, google Los Angeles chemtrails and see the number of people on the net complaining about them!
and in all the pics i took all those years I see not a single chemtrail, what are the chances of that?
.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 14:38,
archived)
and in all the pics i took all those years I see not a single chemtrail, what are the chances of that?
.

because what you ask is impossible. There are no such things as chemtrails so I can't produce any pictures of them.
I can show you jet vapour trails from 1954 though www.anseladams.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=963
and anyone with the slightest knowledge of the internet can find hundreds of such photographs dating back to the second world war.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 14:21,
archived)
I can show you jet vapour trails from 1954 though www.anseladams.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=963
and anyone with the slightest knowledge of the internet can find hundreds of such photographs dating back to the second world war.

People are noticing the changing of our skys all over the world and i don’t buy into what you have to say about “not trusting our memorys” People i know whom i have not spoken to about this subject have had an instinctive reaction that not all is as it should be in our skies. And have then sought to seek infomation on the subject. People everywhere, everyday are finding something wrong with the way the sky looks. Are all these people just imagining it?
I do not pretend to know what you’re motives are for posting your poor grasp of skywatching, as i’ve said before, you very well may be a firm true believer that “chemtrails” are in fact non- existent. But i have looked at both sides of the argument and i am very much swinging towards chemtrails being a very real and potentially hazardous reality.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 14:30,
archived)
I do not pretend to know what you’re motives are for posting your poor grasp of skywatching, as i’ve said before, you very well may be a firm true believer that “chemtrails” are in fact non- existent. But i have looked at both sides of the argument and i am very much swinging towards chemtrails being a very real and potentially hazardous reality.

Maybe they want the attention.
The end.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 14:32,
archived)
The end.

/just a personal opinion only, I might add.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 14:34,
archived)

I'd say a lot of people aren't so much imagining it as they are reading hokum theories on the internet and being gullible enough to believe them
/just a personal opinion only, I might add.
yes, it is not that i can watch the skies daily, and see they spray on some days and not others, or that if is too windy they simply stop spraying in the middle of the day, or that i see them turning the sprayers on and off. No, it is that i read a theory on the internet.
Wow, you are amazing.
And i read your contrail science page there, did you read the comments at the bottom? No one believes any of the crap written, because we have eyes and can see what is happening, but sadly you don't watch the skies. Stay asleep, it is much safer for your fragile mind.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 17:00,
archived)
/just a personal opinion only, I might add.
yes, it is not that i can watch the skies daily, and see they spray on some days and not others, or that if is too windy they simply stop spraying in the middle of the day, or that i see them turning the sprayers on and off. No, it is that i read a theory on the internet.
Wow, you are amazing.
And i read your contrail science page there, did you read the comments at the bottom? No one believes any of the crap written, because we have eyes and can see what is happening, but sadly you don't watch the skies. Stay asleep, it is much safer for your fragile mind.

than look down and know you're grounded.
Selective reading of comments simply because they don't agree with the scientific argument put forward does not constitue scientific evidence for your argument. Please, expand your 'research' to look at the rest of the site. Quite enlightening.
Fragile Mind? Pot, Kettle. Black.
and please, answer my question above which you have conveniently ignored.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 17:28,
archived)
Selective reading of comments simply because they don't agree with the scientific argument put forward does not constitue scientific evidence for your argument. Please, expand your 'research' to look at the rest of the site. Quite enlightening.
Fragile Mind? Pot, Kettle. Black.
and please, answer my question above which you have conveniently ignored.

asked questions and a couple of comments disagreed without offering anything other than blind refusal to accept.
Just because you are not alone in your madness does not make it any more true.
You can't argue with simple scientific law. Well, YOU can, but not with any conviction or substantive fact.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 17:53,
archived)
Just because you are not alone in your madness does not make it any more true.
You can't argue with simple scientific law. Well, YOU can, but not with any conviction or substantive fact.

I live closer to it today. I'm older than you and I can recall just fine the criss-crossing of water vapour across the skies as a child as they fascinated me. I can remember being on a Wardair 747 in 1980 on the way to Toronto and marvelling that we were actually flying above some of these trails.
There is nothing going on today that is any different that can't be explained by an increase in traffic.
As for a grasp of 'skywatching' I have no idea what that is. But as I have one of these www.scopereviews.com/178ed.html you can be assured I know a bit more than you assume.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 14:52,
archived)
There is nothing going on today that is any different that can't be explained by an increase in traffic.
As for a grasp of 'skywatching' I have no idea what that is. But as I have one of these www.scopereviews.com/178ed.html you can be assured I know a bit more than you assume.

just answering the infinitely retarded Passy.
He struggles to answer the simple questions, needs comforting.
.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 14:16,
archived)
He struggles to answer the simple questions, needs comforting.
.

I've not been asked any questions.
I've provided some simple logic and scientific understanding for some of the outlandish claims you make but I don't recall being given any questions I've struggled with.
I don't have the sort of IQ that struggles with anything, apart from understanding the mentally ill. I can't get my head around that shit.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 14:24,
archived)
I've provided some simple logic and scientific understanding for some of the outlandish claims you make but I don't recall being given any questions I've struggled with.
I don't have the sort of IQ that struggles with anything, apart from understanding the mentally ill. I can't get my head around that shit.

few are worthy of that, ask passy.
.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 13:54,
archived)
.

with face scanning technology to log in every move you make
tracking and tracing every swipe of my credit card,
yes, I have nothing to hide, i love my government, they would never poison my water, food, air or mind.
so yes I love your idea of freedom.
.
( ,
Tue 5 May 2009, 14:10,
archived)
tracking and tracing every swipe of my credit card,
yes, I have nothing to hide, i love my government, they would never poison my water, food, air or mind.
so yes I love your idea of freedom.
.