
not even chaos theory? or do I have to bust out quantum physics to look appealing? Now to slag off the clog wearer.
( ,
Sat 13 Jun 2009, 14:15,
archived)

No need to bring Quantum Physics into this.
Chaos is lovely but I just can't get in to numbers. Start talkin' theory and we'll see.
( ,
Sat 13 Jun 2009, 14:34,
archived)
Chaos is lovely but I just can't get in to numbers. Start talkin' theory and we'll see.

appreciate it's true beauty. chaos is kinda dull, pop sci seems to associate it with fractals and ignore the rest of the interesting structure of the equations, because fractals make pretty pictures. Here have some fluid dynamics.

( ,
Sat 13 Jun 2009, 14:40,
archived)


It's a child playing duck, duck, goose alone.
( ,
Sat 13 Jun 2009, 14:54,
archived)

He's also wearing more than one hat
( ,
Sat 13 Jun 2009, 14:54,
archived)


with zero stream-function bcs
( ,
Sat 13 Jun 2009, 14:59,
archived)

Perhaps the numerological dyslexia is a large part of my distaste for maths... I can see the practical and intricate integration of math and life but I just like the life part of it. Especially clouds.
SO - pretty pictures and numberless theory is nice (but not so much string theory... I can't see existence as particularly linear ((the word deserves its own few pages of footnotes)).)
I'm currently working on developing insanity by removing the linear conditioning of words as thoughts. Kinda frustrating at times but fun as all hell to think entirely in concepts without allowing the socially injected lables and macros.
( ,
Sat 13 Jun 2009, 14:53,
archived)
SO - pretty pictures and numberless theory is nice (but not so much string theory... I can't see existence as particularly linear ((the word deserves its own few pages of footnotes)).)
I'm currently working on developing insanity by removing the linear conditioning of words as thoughts. Kinda frustrating at times but fun as all hell to think entirely in concepts without allowing the socially injected lables and macros.

Seriously... that's about it. On the bright side it offers a lot of time to kick back with a bottle of sake and consider life. Course I confuse the hell out of people after a full bottle. One night all those who work at the store went to a bar after work and one of them was stuck listening to me babble about things like what there is between air and skin. By the end of the night she was quite certain there had to be something there. (In cartoons it's a black line, you know.)
( ,
Sat 13 Jun 2009, 15:00,
archived)

and there is a boundary layer there...
( ,
Sat 13 Jun 2009, 15:04,
archived)

Finally! Someone who doesn't just look at me as if I've smoked something illegal and probably volatile.
( ,
Sat 13 Jun 2009, 15:07,
archived)

was a place to discuss kittens and tubgirl?
( ,
Sat 13 Jun 2009, 14:58,
archived)

But I don't care bout tubgirl. You can have her.
( ,
Sat 13 Jun 2009, 15:00,
archived)

this is wonderful stuff.
Pure abstract thinking, with little or no reference to external objects (in both the physical and psychoanalytical senses) will lead to novel associations.
Oh yes, and frequently psychosis.
( ,
Sat 13 Jun 2009, 15:50,
archived)
Pure abstract thinking, with little or no reference to external objects (in both the physical and psychoanalytical senses) will lead to novel associations.
Oh yes, and frequently psychosis.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_that_π_is_irrational
cartwright's proof is the one i am familar with.
( ,
Sat 13 Jun 2009, 14:42,
archived)
cartwright's proof is the one i am familar with.