
One thing I'd say: I reckon 'target-obsession' isn't all the fault of ministers. I think it's a feature of society generally, which has spread to pretty much every field of endeavour.
( ,
Wed 14 Oct 2009, 15:51,
archived)

And if so it doesn't bode well for the future of education :(
Failing another academic job I may actually go into private tutoring -- that way you're free from the constraints of national syllabi, to teach what you want how you want to. That might be quite nice, especially if I could catch university-level kids who want to move on faster than their courses are letting them. A friend of mine did that here, a quantum mechanics course in the evenings for *first-year* university students that's at least as good as my fourth-year course was. It was seriously well attended and she got awards for lecturing. Now that kind of thing does appeal. I'd teach relativity and statistical mechanics, properly.
Of course, my friend is also ludicrously gorgeous, which probably helped her, and I'm not, but I've had students tell me I can teach...
( ,
Wed 14 Oct 2009, 16:02,
archived)
Failing another academic job I may actually go into private tutoring -- that way you're free from the constraints of national syllabi, to teach what you want how you want to. That might be quite nice, especially if I could catch university-level kids who want to move on faster than their courses are letting them. A friend of mine did that here, a quantum mechanics course in the evenings for *first-year* university students that's at least as good as my fourth-year course was. It was seriously well attended and she got awards for lecturing. Now that kind of thing does appeal. I'd teach relativity and statistical mechanics, properly.
Of course, my friend is also ludicrously gorgeous, which probably helped her, and I'm not, but I've had students tell me I can teach...

I wonder what we as individuals can do to try to reverse this target-obsession?
Right now I'm so depressed about it my preferred solution is "emigrate" :-(
There must be a more positive and useful response?
( ,
Wed 14 Oct 2009, 16:24,
archived)
Right now I'm so depressed about it my preferred solution is "emigrate" :-(
There must be a more positive and useful response?

is private tuition. The only problem there is most of hte people who come to you have come to you to revise for exams, so you end up sucked into the whole thing. :(
( ,
Wed 14 Oct 2009, 16:36,
archived)

(Or whatever it's called this week).
Would enough parents vote for a 'reduced assessment' school? Given such a vote, could the school act on it, and refuse to do all the assessments thatDfESDfCSF demands? I guess not, without losing state funding :-( :-(
I always shook my head at US School Boards mandating textbooks etc. But the situation here seems much worse :-(
( ,
Wed 14 Oct 2009, 16:57,
archived)
Would enough parents vote for a 'reduced assessment' school? Given such a vote, could the school act on it, and refuse to do all the assessments that
I always shook my head at US School Boards mandating textbooks etc. But the situation here seems much worse :-(

Make some noise; influence some more voters.
In order of who my parents voted for :-)...
Lib Dem: "Equity & Excellence" (education policy)
Conservative: Schools Policy Paper
Quote: "1.1 Tackling discipline, preventing failure
Poor pupil behaviour is the most serious problem preventing teachers doing the job they love. Classrooms in which students are disruptive are environments in which no-one can learn. Pupils who feel they can defy teachers with impunity subvert the calm order which is needed for schools to function effectively. But in many of Britain’s classrooms students are not learning, nor allowing others to learn. Instead they are openly transgressing the boundaries which define good behaviour. It demonstrates not just a lack of respect for learning itself, but for others within the school community, and teachers have to be given the tools to tackle this issue at root. The balance has to shift back in the classroom, in favour of the teacher."
Labour: all I can find is this: Schools.
...
Wow. Well, on the basis of the words at least, Conservatives seem to have their heads actually screwed on properly on this one.
( ,
Wed 14 Oct 2009, 17:01,
archived)
In order of who my parents voted for :-)...
Lib Dem: "Equity & Excellence" (education policy)
Conservative: Schools Policy Paper
Quote: "1.1 Tackling discipline, preventing failure
Poor pupil behaviour is the most serious problem preventing teachers doing the job they love. Classrooms in which students are disruptive are environments in which no-one can learn. Pupils who feel they can defy teachers with impunity subvert the calm order which is needed for schools to function effectively. But in many of Britain’s classrooms students are not learning, nor allowing others to learn. Instead they are openly transgressing the boundaries which define good behaviour. It demonstrates not just a lack of respect for learning itself, but for others within the school community, and teachers have to be given the tools to tackle this issue at root. The balance has to shift back in the classroom, in favour of the teacher."
Labour: all I can find is this: Schools.
...
Wow. Well, on the basis of the words at least, Conservatives seem to have their heads actually screwed on properly on this one.