Giving all tax income to banks might have something going for it.
truebetter than sending people to Iraq etc
(
The Twisted Omentum vidi vici veni,
Tue 20 Oct 2009, 17:14,
archived)
Banks don't usually have very disagreeable plans for usbeyond wanting us to upgrade our credit cards and buy pet insurance.
Maybe if banks had more power those things would become compulsory, but it could be worse.
(,
Tue 20 Oct 2009, 17:20,
archived)
Maybe if banks had more power those things would become compulsory, but it could be worse.
Personally, I prefer my money to be spent on things like health and social care, policing etc. rather than inflating the next bubble and funding personal debt.Maybe I'm weird.
(
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Tue 20 Oct 2009, 17:22,
archived)
A health service funded by donations funded by banks funded by the tax payer?I think I see an easier way.
( my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Tue 20 Oct 2009, 17:28,
archived)
Yes, the government could just not take anybody's money away in the first placebut nobody much seems to like that idea, because we all have plans for what should be done with everybody else's money.
(,
Tue 20 Oct 2009, 17:33,
archived)
If they don't take our money, private healthcare, security, insurance, waste management and transport companies will.I'm happier giving my money to someone that's accountable to me and other voters, rather than to shareholders.
( my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Tue 20 Oct 2009, 17:35,
archived)
Private companies don't take our money.We give it willingly, or else we keep it.
(,
Tue 20 Oct 2009, 17:38,
archived)
Well yes.With healthcare, you can either give money to them willingly, or die.
( my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Tue 20 Oct 2009, 17:42,
archived)