b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9876975 (Thread)

# I think I'm fine with it if people are letting the animals fuck them rather than visa versa.
although they do prefer using the term 'makes love to'
(I helped save b3ta! arrangedletters, Mon 18 Jan 2010, 11:49, archived)
# The confusion of morality with disgust in the article is annoying.
"The question is whether immorality should be made illegal." Well, what does he think the rest of Norwegian laws are based on, expedience? (Of course not all immorality can be made illegal, but you'd hope that was the main consideration in such laws as exist.) The question is inherently wrong, and he's wrong about that being the question anyway. ...then again, maybe he means "immorality within the personal domain".
(_Felix 's school of dance and occult sciences, Mon 18 Jan 2010, 12:05, archived)
# I'm of the Millian opinion
that their should only be laws where harm to others has occured.

but this is still a particular grey area. Although i think as long as the animal aint getting penetrated.. job's a good'un.
(I helped save b3ta! arrangedletters, Mon 18 Jan 2010, 12:11, archived)
# Yay actual harm principle.
(_Felix 's school of dance and occult sciences, Mon 18 Jan 2010, 12:13, archived)
# :)
I think I may have to dig out on liberty and give it another read some point soon.
(I helped save b3ta! arrangedletters, Mon 18 Jan 2010, 12:17, archived)