
Unless they get too close to ground, but the conductivity of the air is variable depending upon weather conditions. (moisture etc)
It's all about conductivity Vs resistance.
( ,
Wed 27 Jan 2010, 2:28,
archived)
It's all about conductivity Vs resistance.

two wires on a different phase angle, zap in the case shown the bird seems to be too far away to have been zapped but its possible for a bird to fry itself on some wires.
( ,
Wed 27 Jan 2010, 2:31,
archived)

(not through it)
( ,
Wed 27 Jan 2010, 2:33,
archived)

Insulator This black "knob" is a ceramic or plastic insulator. This is the piece that prevents the pole itself from becoming electrified and allows the current to pass through without resistance.
but if a bird joins the pole and the wire its no longer insulated.
the pole is grounded even without any electricity flowing. I mean i could stick a pole in the ground thats not hooked up to anything its going to be grounded. at least thats what im thinking, I think
( ,
Wed 27 Jan 2010, 2:39,
archived)
but if a bird joins the pole and the wire its no longer insulated.
the pole is grounded even without any electricity flowing. I mean i could stick a pole in the ground thats not hooked up to anything its going to be grounded. at least thats what im thinking, I think

Wasn't it?.. it was on the wire (as in the adage)
( ,
Wed 27 Jan 2010, 2:45,
archived)

There would be potential difference between the two feet and a If the If a bird stood with it's legs far enough apart then a proportion of the current would flow through the bird.
The amount would depend on the relative resistance of bird and wire. Obviously the wire is less resistant so most would stay in the wire, but a fraction would go up one leg and down the other.
So... how far apart would it's legs have to be to generate zappable amounts?
That's right innit?
( ,
Wed 27 Jan 2010, 2:58,
archived)
The amount would depend on the relative resistance of bird and wire. Obviously the wire is less resistant so most would stay in the wire, but a fraction would go up one leg and down the other.
So... how far apart would it's legs have to be to generate zappable amounts?
That's right innit?

This entire thread is fictional.
Which should not detract from the original beauty of the slop work!
(said bird could spread it's legs across MILES of wire, if it is still not grounded to earth, no shorting effect)
( ,
Wed 27 Jan 2010, 3:02,
archived)
Which should not detract from the original beauty of the slop work!
(said bird could spread it's legs across MILES of wire, if it is still not grounded to earth, no shorting effect)

Ok, on a wire... if you put a meter across a section of wire with a current going through it, you will indeed get a potential difference regardless of grounding. Cos wires aren't superconducting.
That's what I learned at skool =)
( ,
Wed 27 Jan 2010, 3:13,
archived)
That's what I learned at skool =)

Then you can start the math for the incidence of lethality
I hope you are more learned than me as you are hopefully the future.. any hoo, my bed calleth, g'night :)
( ,
Wed 27 Jan 2010, 3:16,
archived)
I hope you are more learned than me as you are hopefully the future.. any hoo, my bed calleth, g'night :)

and bird vs steel your more likely to get a current excited in the birds (magneticaly premiable) body resulting from the magnetic field surrounding the cable, than from the diference in distance of its legs on the wire when it lands.
( ,
Wed 27 Jan 2010, 3:25,
archived)

uhmm and are very wet with some kind of juices
edit nn mikenco
( ,
Wed 27 Jan 2010, 3:27,
archived)
edit nn mikenco

Resistivity = 11.8 × 10-6 Ωcm" for steel at 0c
resitance of a dead chicken (Frozen) over the aproximate distance of a starling groin = thats not really fair i mean its forzen and full of water. im going to have to put an ohmeter over a birds groin while its still alive to find out. this is how scientology wins so many arguments. its because people just cant be bothered to refute such atupid claims. Im going to make myself a gin and orange and sulk. and let you win the argument i was having with myself.
( ,
Wed 27 Jan 2010, 3:40,
archived)
resitance of a dead chicken (Frozen) over the aproximate distance of a starling groin = thats not really fair i mean its forzen and full of water. im going to have to put an ohmeter over a birds groin while its still alive to find out. this is how scientology wins so many arguments. its because people just cant be bothered to refute such atupid claims. Im going to make myself a gin and orange and sulk. and let you win the argument i was having with myself.