
he'd wish for a slightly less wonky cameraman.
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 12:21, Reply)

( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 12:52, Reply)

( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 14:55, Reply)

My favourite rule of thumb. Never fails.
Also his middle name is "pee". Pfft.
He's taken a leaf out of Vic Reeves inventions handbook:
- But how does it work, Vic?
- I dunno, but it does
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 12:31, Reply)

No exceptions
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 12:53, Reply)

This is about as likely to work as stabbing someone randomly in the abdomen with a knife to cure them of acute appendicitis.
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 12:59, Reply)

( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 14:01, Reply)

about i before e except after c
twice!
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 14:57, Reply)

Right; so you've got Joe without money, and you programme in the inverse of that (no, really, just go with me).
He's very confident that the inverse of "Joe AND no money" is going to be "Joe AND money". But by parity of reasoning, couldn't you end up with "no Joe AND no money" or - probably more likely - "no Joe AND money"?
Of course, all this assumes that it's not utter horseshit from the start; but it seems to be ill-thought-out horseshit to boot.
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 13:27, Reply)