one thing that Maddox is totally wrong about is when he goes off about how nothing and everything is sexual
the image is clearly erotic
you wouldn't get away drawing a child in that position - except a toddler
(, Thu 4 Sep 2014, 23:26, Reply)
No.
You are saying that the sexuality comes from the pose alone. That makes you a paedo. It comes from the fact it is a fully developed woman AND the pose combined. A child in that pose would only appear sexual to a deviant.
(
Dave Trouser ; the people's choice - 75% agree, Fri 5 Sep 2014, 1:29,
Reply)
I stand corrected
Drawing kids in that pose, and any other suggestive pose, is a OK. Whoever complains is a paedo.
(, Fri 5 Sep 2014, 4:44, Reply)
nothing sexual about My dog licking My balls
While I give him a reach around.
I'm not into beastiality.
Nothing sexual if I drew My Friday night nocturnal act with the dog. You'd have to be a pervert to find it sexual.
(, Fri 5 Sep 2014, 4:51, Reply)
Why are you bringing dogs into it?
What is wrong with you?
(
Dave Trouser ; the people's choice - 75% agree, Fri 5 Sep 2014, 8:59,
Reply)
Haha! A lecture on deviancy
by someone called Dave Trouser!
(
Hardfarter Following through since 1978, Sat 6 Sep 2014, 18:02,
Reply)