
I think the resounding response to this will be there is nothing abnormal or unreasonable about what he's saying here. Because, well, there isn't.
YAY SOSHALESM
( , Wed 3 Dec 2014, 22:54, Reply)

I don't think anyone is saying "no immigration", but rather, follow the process rather than skirting the law.
I always laugh when people say he's a good speaker. Reader, maybe.
( , Wed 3 Dec 2014, 23:07, Reply)

And he *is* following the process. See felixcoen's post down there.
( , Wed 3 Dec 2014, 23:14, Reply)

Look at what Obama said: www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBTSQh27oTU
And choosing how to enforce a law does not create a program by which work permits can be granted. All this takes money and needs a bureaucracy to enforce (ha!, enforce) which cannot be done without Congress.
( , Wed 3 Dec 2014, 23:16, Reply)

www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/opinions/attachments/2014/11/20/2014-11-19-auth-prioritize-removal.pdf
( , Wed 3 Dec 2014, 23:27, Reply)

This is the same DOJ that thought it was legal to allow thousands of assault rifles over the border, killing thousands of Mexicans and at least one federal agent. The same DOJ that hides evidence of political targeting by the revenue service.
( , Wed 3 Dec 2014, 23:29, Reply)

You're getting a bit tinfoil-hattery now.
( , Wed 3 Dec 2014, 23:38, Reply)

Explaining immigration, the USCIS (which handles work permits) the fees involved and how they are paid for. But I have had a shit day at work. Have just got in, and have an open bottle of wine in front of me. Which seems higher on my list than explaining something you could look up on a government website. *cheers!*
( , Wed 3 Dec 2014, 23:31, Reply)

You know like when the Rebels defeated theEmpire at the end of Jedi.
Only to find out he's got a drone army of his own and is being spilly bloody with his xbox controller.
Thing is though the left here still has their blinkers on and think he's the greatest thing since sliced bread even though he's more right wing than are own right wingers.
( , Thu 4 Dec 2014, 8:55, Reply)