Sepp Blatter's Wikipedia Page Had A Bit Of A Re-Write Ahead Of Fifa Presidential Election
Lolz
(, Fri 29 May 2015, 10:57, Share, Reply)
Really? "Lolz"? REALLY?
*pities*
(
Tab Hunter Make this useless process end and so, begin again, Fri 29 May 2015, 11:07,
Share,
Reply)
*changes Wikipedia page to say 'Sepp Blatter is comprised of shit and lots of monies'*
*reports as news*
*awaits OCD editing*
*reports as news*
(
Mudface The web isn't callipygian, Fri 29 May 2015, 11:22,
Share,
Reply)
Has there ever been a Wikipedia edit
that was actually worthwhile or funny (maybe the one about Paul Danan being the only man so rapey he'd actually tried to rape himself)?
It's a bit like writing puerile abuse on a toilet wall, just on a larger scale and more annoying.
(, Fri 29 May 2015, 11:35, Share, Reply)
There was that one a while ago with that football team
In the run up to a match between Man City and a tiny cypriot team called AC Omonia, someone edited the wiki entry to say the fans were called "The Zany Ones", wore hats made from shoes and sang about a little potato.
The Mirror ended up reporting it as fact, which gained some wonderful ridicule, but then some of the fans started doing it anyway.
(
Extinct Jesus Dossier "...I think it counteracts Hitler's magic...", Fri 29 May 2015, 11:48,
Share,
Reply)
Don't be dissing toilet graffiti.
Pictures of Walls is an ace website.
(The "creampie bitch" car also made me smile)
(
Tab Hunter Make this useless process end and so, begin again, Fri 29 May 2015, 11:49,
Share,
Reply)
My favourite bit of toilet graffiti
was in tiny letters at the bottom of a cubicle door.
"If you can read this then you are shitting at 45 degrees"
(, Fri 29 May 2015, 11:52, Share, Reply)
Who would this annoy though?
some mythical being who didn't know Blatter was a tosser?
(, Fri 29 May 2015, 12:43, Share, Reply)
The people who use Wikipedia for accurate information
and the people who actually have to edit it.
(, Fri 29 May 2015, 15:26, Share, Reply)
Wikipedia provides you with tools though.
You can just view the discussion pages and compare the history to see if there is any kind of controversy or edit war. You can also click the links and have a look at the source materials.
If you use wikipedia for critical information, and you don't look at these pages, and you don't check veracity of source material, then you deserve to receive inaccurate information, and F grades for your work.
(, Fri 29 May 2015, 16:32, Share, Reply)
And now the news...
Football, football, football, football, football, football, football,
football, football, football, football, fat crook, football, football,
football, football, football, football, football, football, football.
And now the sport...
(
joefish It's hard for thee to kick against the pricks, Fri 29 May 2015, 11:54,
Share,
Reply)