he appears fairly vindicated that it was never about the swedish case and all about the US wanting to lock him up because of wikileaks making them accountable by revealing their lies
And they had been lying about the deplorable conduct of the war and the financing of it, and we most likely would never had found out if not for wikileaks.
But yeah, woo the establishment. They know what's best.
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Thu 11 Apr 2019, 14:13,
Share,
Reply)
"the swedish case"
You mean the rapes?
(
evil_andy Stick stick stick stick sticky sticky stick stick, Thu 11 Apr 2019, 15:48,
Share,
Reply)
yeah, the one where they dropped the charges of him having consensual sex but not using a condom as apparently he promised
Which constitutes rape in Swedish Law. you know, the one where one of the two victims posted on social media that she was a having a great time at the party hours after the alleged rape occurred. the one where the prosecutor dismissed the initial allegations of the two women who did not initially allege rape but approached police wanting Assange to take an STD test, but another prosecutor revived the case months later by visiting the women and convincing them to press charges, a prosecutor who was running for swedish parliament on a women against violence ticket who in no way was exploiting them to help her political career. The one where assange was interviewed by police, left the country legally, had an unprecedented European arrest warrant for such an alleged offence issued, and then offered for five years to testify by video in court so he wouldn't be put at risk of extradition to the US as the Swedish wouldn't guarantee him immunity from extradition if he appeared in person, testimony that is allowed in Swedish courts, but was inexplicably refused and it now appears that Assanges fears of extradition were entirely justified. That rape?
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Thu 11 Apr 2019, 23:11,
Share,
Reply)