I didn't say it was a tasteful joke.
Also he didn't bogwash anyone (which would of course actually be assault), which is an entirely different thing.
And also, the answer is no, he did literally the opposite of inciting a pile on.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 15:08, Reply)
You said it was clearly a joke given the context.
The context was @ing someone in with abuse, which clearly falls under the malicious communications act.
You haven't said why it is clearly a joke given that context.
(
monkeon schmonkeon, Fri 10 May 2019, 16:54,
Reply)
I'm not sure it's even technically abuse.
There's no threat there. There's no profanity. According to case law it would not be considered grossly offensive. The only thing it actually contains is an implication that she's ugly. I think you'd need some pretty interesting chicanery to actually classify this as abuse from a legal standpoint.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 17:05, Reply)
Try posting notes through
your neighbours' letterbox with his joke on them. See how you get on.
(
monkeon schmonkeon, Fri 10 May 2019, 19:18,
Reply)
Just because I wouldn't post it through my neighbours post box,
doesn't mean it isn't a joke. Your face for example.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 19:28, Reply)