
Ahhh, modern celebrities. All 'woke' and sweet in public while still being the usual ruthless capitalist bastards behind the scenes.
( , Fri 30 Aug 2019, 14:42, Reply)

They have hidden their body, ostensibly to avoid being sexualised and the magazine depicts her as topless.
Not really a definition of ruthless capitalism.
( , Fri 30 Aug 2019, 16:04, Reply)

American pop stars usually seem quite showy with their wealth.
( , Fri 30 Aug 2019, 16:58, Reply)

She seems to be impersonating a compendium of bad 90's rappers in most of her photos. That's an alarming amount of leather footwear, too - for somebody who claims to be vegan.
( , Fri 30 Aug 2019, 17:15, Reply)

Thom Yorke has already soiled his copy. "The fucking only interesting wank I have nowadays".
( , Fri 30 Aug 2019, 17:36, Reply)

( , Fri 30 Aug 2019, 17:37, Reply)

It's the head of an android with her features and she wants to be consulted. Interesting that with just the top of the android's shoulders she can call it as topless. Looks ridiculous, sings crap, talks shit
( , Fri 30 Aug 2019, 18:46, Reply)

Less than 10 minutes of googling has led me to the conclusion that she's a fucking poser. The vegan thing especially touches a nerve. Either be fucking vegan or don't be fucking vegan. Don't claim to be vegan and continue wearing leather and fuck knows what else.
And don't try to claim your image is cultivated around the prevention of sexualisation or body shaming. What a load of utter fucking tosh.
( , Fri 30 Aug 2019, 19:14, Reply)

she's complained that she doesn't like a cover.
( , Fri 30 Aug 2019, 19:59, Reply)

so she must be doing something right.
( , Fri 30 Aug 2019, 22:19, Reply)

If your brand can be done irreparable harm by a cover as innocuous as that, then maybe your brand isn't all that.
Unless of course, your brand is actually just cashing in on the "everyone's entitled to be offended by everything" wave, in which case fuck you.
( , Fri 30 Aug 2019, 22:10, Reply)

She has an apparently (allegedly?) well known thing about being sexualised, and probably considers this pretty humiliating.
Calling it out as skeezy doesn't need to involve being brand obsessed or a ruthless capitalist (what?!).
And also, now you mention it, whats even the problem with being offended and saying as much.
You don't see an irony in being 'offended' enough by it, to wish fuckings on those doing it?
Have you considered 'fucking yourself' over it? :)
( , Sat 31 Aug 2019, 10:52, Reply)

I do hope that doesn't offend anyone.
( , Fri 30 Aug 2019, 22:21, Reply)

getting sniffy about a famous child complaining about the media misrepresenting her. Good old b3ta.
( , Fri 30 Aug 2019, 23:23, Reply)