You didn't answer any of my questions.
I agree with you that there is indeed a video game.
It does indeed contain the dialogue that you spam here every week.
Dogbomb did indeed make a video of himself playing that game.
Dogbomb almost certainly did not know about the part of the game containing the one line of dialogue you keep spamming.
Do you accept that there is a mountain of evidence that you are fundamentally wrong about
- the nature of the game?
- the content of the game?
- how the game presents paedophilia?
Do you actually accept that it is possible to address the issue of paedophilia in a way that does not normalise or glorify paedophilia?
Under what circumstances can you imagine yourself admitting that you are wrong? What standard of proof would you require?
How would you feel if someone repeatedly and systematically slandered you with 'paedo stuff'?
The onus is on you to prove that dogbomb, Youtube, Steam, and seemingly everybody else in the world, are all wrong.
(
brb natural fistic, Sat 4 Jul 2020, 15:44,
Reply)