
OK, sure.
One at a time, OK?
You said, "It does indeed contain the dialogue that you spam here every week."
Please show evidence that I spammed it every week, or apologise for the severe exaggeration.
i posted about it twice recently. Last week, and this.
Also, when he first posted it, in 2019.
Not every week.
Respond to that, and we can move on to the next point.
( , Sat 4 Jul 2020, 17:25, Reply)

But fine, you have spammed it this week and last week, not every week. I apologise for getting that point wrong.
( , Sat 4 Jul 2020, 17:36, Reply)

Yes, it's fine to take them one at a time.
( , Sat 4 Jul 2020, 17:45, Reply)

And, BTW, I have been slandered with accusations about me being a paedo - during this discussion, on b3ta.
Example.
"How does it make you feel?"
Water off a duck's back, basically.
[Re. "How would you feel if someone repeatedly and systematically slandered you with 'paedo stuff'?"]
( , Sat 4 Jul 2020, 17:58, Reply)

( , Sat 4 Jul 2020, 20:07, Reply)

The picture accurately mocks you for saying that reviewing a game with a paedophile joke makes you (the reviewer) a paedophile.
( , Sat 4 Jul 2020, 20:55, Reply)

( , Sat 4 Jul 2020, 21:13, Reply)

Fuck off.
( , Sat 4 Jul 2020, 22:15, Reply)

fuck: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouroboros
( , Sat 4 Jul 2020, 22:29, Reply)

b3ta.com/links/1543641
You say "And, BTW, I have been slandered with accusations about me being a paedo - during this discussion, on b3ta." Then your link, named "Example" has no example of anyone accusing you of being a paedo.
Then Mr P and me both pointed this out, to which you replied with another link to someone not calling you a paedo.
Then I pointed that out and you denied claiming anyone was accusing you of being a paedo.
Then I typed this message explaining the chain of events.
( , Sat 4 Jul 2020, 22:52, Reply)

You have truly exposed yourself tonight, SockCooker.
( , Sun 5 Jul 2020, 2:20, Reply)