christ it took him 5mins before he thought of throwing a rock.
that initial picture is click baitish
(, Tue 13 Oct 2020, 22:45, Reply)
A bit harsh
It's the fight-or-film response
(
Mudface The web isn't callipygian, Tue 13 Oct 2020, 22:51,
Reply)
see your point, but
I would say a vicious dog would possibly be more dangerous - who don't give you 5mins to think
(, Tue 13 Oct 2020, 23:00, Reply)
Also I'm not sure you're allowed to use anything but firearm to defend yourself in the States
(
Mudface The web isn't callipygian, Tue 13 Oct 2020, 23:02,
Reply)
this is interesting,
www.quora.com/Could-a-human-fight-a-cougar-and-win
(, Tue 13 Oct 2020, 23:08, Reply)
Pumas can be very stealthy and this is not the case in the video
The animal was just trying to scare him off.
Dogs are more familiar and predictable and without slashy claws
(
Mudface The web isn't callipygian, Tue 13 Oct 2020, 23:18,
Reply)
One situation where I'd want a gun.
Even a starting pistol or whistle might keep it at a distance. He carried on filming, in portrait.
Probably just running him off her territory.
(
FeralCatMan Long ads need comments sections, Tue 13 Oct 2020, 23:44,
Reply)
Which one of you..
There may be some monster male humans that have the ability to defend themselves, barehanded, against such a beast. However, this situation would be statistically insignificant, in my opinion.
(
pineapplecharm D d M Y, H:i, Wed 14 Oct 2020, 10:28,
Reply)
Brian Blessed would win.
(
FeralCatMan Long ads need comments sections, Wed 14 Oct 2020, 15:20,
Reply)
First thing I thought of while watching the video
was 'what a lot of handy sticks and stones lying around.' I think I'd have probably kicked some stones at it, then found a hefty rock or branch after PUTTING MY FUCKING PHONE AWAY.
But I guess it's probably different when you're in the moment with the adrenaline and tunnel vision and the FUCKING NARCISSISM.
(
brb man-child cuck corporate supplicant fuck, Wed 14 Oct 2020, 15:38,
Reply)